From Questions to Queries: An AI-powered Multi-Agent Framework for Spatial Text-to-SQL
Fuente:
arXiv
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2025
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866914428339879936 |
|---|---|
| author | Kazazi, Ali Khosravi Li, Zhenlong Lessani, M. Naser Cervone, Guido |
| author_facet | Kazazi, Ali Khosravi Li, Zhenlong Lessani, M. Naser Cervone, Guido |
| contents | The complexity of SQL and the spatial semantics of PostGIS create barriers for non-experts working with spatial data. Although large language models can translate natural language into SQL, spatial Text-to-SQL is more error-prone than general Text-to-SQL because it must resolve geographic intent, schema ambiguity, geometry-bearing tables and columns, spatial function choice, and coordinate reference system and measurement assumptions. We introduce a multi-agent framework that addresses these coupled challenges through staged interpretation, schema grounding, logical planning, SQL generation, and execution-based review. The framework is supported by a knowledge base with programmatic schema profiling, semantic enrichment, and embedding-based retrieval. We evaluated the framework on the non-spatial KaggleDBQA benchmark and on SpatialQueryQA, a new multi-level and coverage-oriented benchmark with diverse geometry types, workload categories, and spatial operations. On KaggleDBQA, the system reached 81.2% accuracy, 221 of 272 questions, after reviewer corrections. On SpatialQueryQA, the system achieved 87.7% accuracy, 79 of 90, compared with 76.7% without the review stage. These results show that decomposing the task into specialized but tightly coupled agents improves robustness, especially for spatially sensitive queries. The study improves access to spatial analysis and provides a practical step toward more reliable spatial Text-to-SQL systems and autonomous GIS. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2510_21045 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | From Questions to Queries: An AI-powered Multi-Agent Framework for Spatial Text-to-SQL Kazazi, Ali Khosravi Li, Zhenlong Lessani, M. Naser Cervone, Guido Artificial Intelligence Databases Information Retrieval The complexity of SQL and the spatial semantics of PostGIS create barriers for non-experts working with spatial data. Although large language models can translate natural language into SQL, spatial Text-to-SQL is more error-prone than general Text-to-SQL because it must resolve geographic intent, schema ambiguity, geometry-bearing tables and columns, spatial function choice, and coordinate reference system and measurement assumptions. We introduce a multi-agent framework that addresses these coupled challenges through staged interpretation, schema grounding, logical planning, SQL generation, and execution-based review. The framework is supported by a knowledge base with programmatic schema profiling, semantic enrichment, and embedding-based retrieval. We evaluated the framework on the non-spatial KaggleDBQA benchmark and on SpatialQueryQA, a new multi-level and coverage-oriented benchmark with diverse geometry types, workload categories, and spatial operations. On KaggleDBQA, the system reached 81.2% accuracy, 221 of 272 questions, after reviewer corrections. On SpatialQueryQA, the system achieved 87.7% accuracy, 79 of 90, compared with 76.7% without the review stage. These results show that decomposing the task into specialized but tightly coupled agents improves robustness, especially for spatially sensitive queries. The study improves access to spatial analysis and provides a practical step toward more reliable spatial Text-to-SQL systems and autonomous GIS. |
| title | From Questions to Queries: An AI-powered Multi-Agent Framework for Spatial Text-to-SQL |
| topic | Artificial Intelligence Databases Information Retrieval |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.21045 |