_version_ 1866918169275269120
author Liu, Bolun
Nguyen, Trang Quynh
Stuart, Elizabeth A.
Lau, Bryan
Kress, Amii M.
Elliott, Michael R.
Busse, Kyle R.
Caniglia, Ellen C.
Chakraborti, Yajnaseni
Elliott, Amy J.
Gern, James E.
Hipwell, Alison E.
Karr, Catherine J.
LeWinn, Kaja Z.
Luo, Li
Müller, Hans-Georg
Mumford, Sunni L.
Nguyen, Ruby H. N.
Oken, Emily
Peacock, Janet L.
Schisterman, Enrique F.
Sondhi, Arjun
Wright, Rosalind J.
Zhou, Yidong
Ogburn, Elizabeth L.
author_facet Liu, Bolun
Nguyen, Trang Quynh
Stuart, Elizabeth A.
Lau, Bryan
Kress, Amii M.
Elliott, Michael R.
Busse, Kyle R.
Caniglia, Ellen C.
Chakraborti, Yajnaseni
Elliott, Amy J.
Gern, James E.
Hipwell, Alison E.
Karr, Catherine J.
LeWinn, Kaja Z.
Luo, Li
Müller, Hans-Georg
Mumford, Sunni L.
Nguyen, Ruby H. N.
Oken, Emily
Peacock, Janet L.
Schisterman, Enrique F.
Sondhi, Arjun
Wright, Rosalind J.
Zhou, Yidong
Ogburn, Elizabeth L.
contents Unobserved effect modifiers can induce bias when generalizing causal effect estimates to target populations. In this work, we extend a sensitivity analysis framework assessing the robustness of study results to unobserved effect modification that adapts to various generalizability scenarios, including multiple (conditionally) randomized trials, observational studies, or combinations thereof. This framework is interpretable and does not rely on distributional or functional assumptions about unknown parameters. We demonstrate how to leverage the multi-study setting to detect violation of the generalizability assumption through hypothesis testing, showing with simulations that the proposed test achieves high power under real-world sample sizes. Finally, we apply our sensitivity analysis framework to analyze the generalized effect estimate of secondhand smoke exposure on birth weight using cohort sites from the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) study.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2510_21116
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Sensitivity Analysis when Generalizing Causal Effects from Multiple Studies to a Target Population: Motivation from the ECHO Program
Liu, Bolun
Nguyen, Trang Quynh
Stuart, Elizabeth A.
Lau, Bryan
Kress, Amii M.
Elliott, Michael R.
Busse, Kyle R.
Caniglia, Ellen C.
Chakraborti, Yajnaseni
Elliott, Amy J.
Gern, James E.
Hipwell, Alison E.
Karr, Catherine J.
LeWinn, Kaja Z.
Luo, Li
Müller, Hans-Georg
Mumford, Sunni L.
Nguyen, Ruby H. N.
Oken, Emily
Peacock, Janet L.
Schisterman, Enrique F.
Sondhi, Arjun
Wright, Rosalind J.
Zhou, Yidong
Ogburn, Elizabeth L.
Methodology
Applications
Unobserved effect modifiers can induce bias when generalizing causal effect estimates to target populations. In this work, we extend a sensitivity analysis framework assessing the robustness of study results to unobserved effect modification that adapts to various generalizability scenarios, including multiple (conditionally) randomized trials, observational studies, or combinations thereof. This framework is interpretable and does not rely on distributional or functional assumptions about unknown parameters. We demonstrate how to leverage the multi-study setting to detect violation of the generalizability assumption through hypothesis testing, showing with simulations that the proposed test achieves high power under real-world sample sizes. Finally, we apply our sensitivity analysis framework to analyze the generalized effect estimate of secondhand smoke exposure on birth weight using cohort sites from the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) study.
title Sensitivity Analysis when Generalizing Causal Effects from Multiple Studies to a Target Population: Motivation from the ECHO Program
topic Methodology
Applications
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.21116