Social Simulations with Large Language Model Risk Utopian Illusion

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Bian, Ning, Han, Xianpei, Lin, Hongyu, Wu, Baolei, Wang, Jun
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2025
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866915573822128128
author Bian, Ning
Han, Xianpei
Lin, Hongyu
Wu, Baolei
Wang, Jun
author_facet Bian, Ning
Han, Xianpei
Lin, Hongyu
Wu, Baolei
Wang, Jun
contents Reliable simulation of human behavior is essential for explaining, predicting, and intervening in our society. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in emulating human behaviors, interactions, and decision-making, offering a powerful new lens for social science studies. However, the extent to which LLMs diverge from authentic human behavior in social contexts remains underexplored, posing risks of misinterpretation in scientific studies and unintended consequences in real-world applications. Here, we introduce a systematic framework for analyzing LLMs' behavior in social simulation. Our approach simulates multi-agent interactions through chatroom-style conversations and analyzes them across five linguistic dimensions, providing a simple yet effective method to examine emergent social cognitive biases. We conduct extensive experiments involving eight representative LLMs across three families. Our findings reveal that LLMs do not faithfully reproduce genuine human behavior but instead reflect overly idealized versions of it, shaped by the social desirability bias. In particular, LLMs show social role bias, primacy effect, and positivity bias, resulting in "Utopian" societies that lack the complexity and variability of real human interactions. These findings call for more socially grounded LLMs that capture the diversity of human social behavior.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2510_21180
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Social Simulations with Large Language Model Risk Utopian Illusion
Bian, Ning
Han, Xianpei
Lin, Hongyu
Wu, Baolei
Wang, Jun
Computation and Language
Social and Information Networks
Reliable simulation of human behavior is essential for explaining, predicting, and intervening in our society. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in emulating human behaviors, interactions, and decision-making, offering a powerful new lens for social science studies. However, the extent to which LLMs diverge from authentic human behavior in social contexts remains underexplored, posing risks of misinterpretation in scientific studies and unintended consequences in real-world applications. Here, we introduce a systematic framework for analyzing LLMs' behavior in social simulation. Our approach simulates multi-agent interactions through chatroom-style conversations and analyzes them across five linguistic dimensions, providing a simple yet effective method to examine emergent social cognitive biases. We conduct extensive experiments involving eight representative LLMs across three families. Our findings reveal that LLMs do not faithfully reproduce genuine human behavior but instead reflect overly idealized versions of it, shaped by the social desirability bias. In particular, LLMs show social role bias, primacy effect, and positivity bias, resulting in "Utopian" societies that lack the complexity and variability of real human interactions. These findings call for more socially grounded LLMs that capture the diversity of human social behavior.
title Social Simulations with Large Language Model Risk Utopian Illusion
topic Computation and Language
Social and Information Networks
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.21180