Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ye, Mengyu, Suzuki, Jun, Inaba, Tatsuro, Kuribayashi, Tatsuki
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.22332
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866909870063616000
author Ye, Mengyu
Suzuki, Jun
Inaba, Tatsuro
Kuribayashi, Tatsuki
author_facet Ye, Mengyu
Suzuki, Jun
Inaba, Tatsuro
Kuribayashi, Tatsuki
contents Recent interpretability work on large language models (LLMs) has been increasingly dominated by a feature-discovery approach with the help of proxy modules. Then, the quality of features learned by, e.g., sparse auto-encoders (SAEs), is evaluated. This paradigm naturally raises a critical question: do such learned features have better properties than those already represented within the original model parameters, and unfortunately, only a few studies have made such comparisons systematically so far. In this work, we revisit the interpretability of feature vectors stored in feed-forward (FF) layers, given the perspective of FF as key-value memories, with modern interpretability benchmarks. Our extensive evaluation revealed that SAE and FFs exhibits a similar range of interpretability, although SAEs displayed an observable but minimal improvement in some aspects. Furthermore, in certain aspects, surprisingly, even vanilla FFs yielded better interpretability than the SAEs, and features discovered in SAEs and FFs diverged. These bring questions about the advantage of SAEs from both perspectives of feature quality and faithfulness, compared to directly interpreting FF feature vectors, and FF key-value parameters serve as a strong baseline in modern interpretability research.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2510_22332
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Transformer Key-Value Memories Are Nearly as Interpretable as Sparse Autoencoders
Ye, Mengyu
Suzuki, Jun
Inaba, Tatsuro
Kuribayashi, Tatsuki
Machine Learning
Recent interpretability work on large language models (LLMs) has been increasingly dominated by a feature-discovery approach with the help of proxy modules. Then, the quality of features learned by, e.g., sparse auto-encoders (SAEs), is evaluated. This paradigm naturally raises a critical question: do such learned features have better properties than those already represented within the original model parameters, and unfortunately, only a few studies have made such comparisons systematically so far. In this work, we revisit the interpretability of feature vectors stored in feed-forward (FF) layers, given the perspective of FF as key-value memories, with modern interpretability benchmarks. Our extensive evaluation revealed that SAE and FFs exhibits a similar range of interpretability, although SAEs displayed an observable but minimal improvement in some aspects. Furthermore, in certain aspects, surprisingly, even vanilla FFs yielded better interpretability than the SAEs, and features discovered in SAEs and FFs diverged. These bring questions about the advantage of SAEs from both perspectives of feature quality and faithfulness, compared to directly interpreting FF feature vectors, and FF key-value parameters serve as a strong baseline in modern interpretability research.
title Transformer Key-Value Memories Are Nearly as Interpretable as Sparse Autoencoders
topic Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.22332