Imagen de Portada

Can ChatGPT be a good follower of academic paradigms? Research quality evaluations in conflicting areas of sociology

Fuente: arXiv

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Thelwall, Mike, Schroeder, Ralph, Dhanda, Meena
Formato:	Preprint
Publicado:	2025
Materias:	Digital Libraries
Acceso en línea:	Acceder al recurso
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

Ejemplares similares

Can ChatGPT evaluate research quality?
por: Thelwall, Mike
Publicado: (2024)

Estimating the quality of academic books from their descriptions with ChatGPT
por: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

Research evaluation with ChatGPT: Is it age, country, length, or field biased?
por: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2024)

Assessing the societal influence of academic research with ChatGPT: Impact case study evaluations
por: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Publicado: (2024)

Which stylistic features fool ChatGPT research evaluations?
por: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Publicado: (2026)

Can ChatGPT evaluate research environments? Evidence from REF2021
por: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

In which fields do ChatGPT scores align better than citations with research quality?
por: Thelwall, Mike
Publicado: (2025)

In which fields can ChatGPT detect journal article quality? An evaluation of REF2021 results
por: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2024)

A Global South Strategy for Evaluating Research Value with ChatGPT
por: Nunkoo, Robin, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

Implicit and Explicit Research Quality Score Probabilities from ChatGPT
por: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

How much are LLMs changing the language of academic papers after ChatGPT? A multi-database and full text analysis
por: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

Evaluating Research Quality with Large Language Models: An Analysis of ChatGPT's Effectiveness with Different Settings and Inputs
por: Thelwall, Mike
Publicado: (2024)

Evaluating the quality of published medical research with ChatGPT
por: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2024)

Journal Quality Factors from ChatGPT: More meaningful than Impact Factors?
por: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2024)

Evaluating the Predictive Capacity of ChatGPT for Academic Peer Review Outcomes Across Multiple Platforms
por: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2024)

Research quality evaluation by AI in the era of Large Language Models: Advantages, disadvantages, and systemic effects
por: Thelwall, Mike
Publicado: (2025)

Can Smaller Large Language Models Evaluate Research Quality?
por: Thelwall, Mike
Publicado: (2025)

Will AI be overconfident about academic research findings when reliant on abstracts? (v1)
por: Thelwall, Mike
Publicado: (2026)

Quantitative Methods in Research Evaluation Citation Indicators, Altmetrics, and Artificial Intelligence
por: Thelwall, Mike
Publicado: (2024)

Can Large Language Models Evaluate Grant Proposal Quality? Revisiting the Wennerås and Wold Peer Review Data
por: Sandström, Ulf, et al.
Publicado: (2026)

Prompt perturbation and fraction facilitation sometimes strengthen Large Language Model scores
por: Thelwall, Mike
Publicado: (2025)

Do Large Language Models know Which Published Articles have been Retracted?
por: Thelwall, Mike
Publicado: (2026)

Can Small and Reasoning Large Language Models Score Journal Articles for Research Quality and Do Averaging and Few-shot Help?
por: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

Is OpenAlex Suitable for Research Quality Evaluation and Which Citation Indicator is Best?
por: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

Designing large language model prompts to extract scores from messy text: A shared dataset and challenge
por: Thelwall, Mike
Publicado: (2026)

Have LLM-associated terms increased in article full texts in all fields?
por: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2026)

ChatGPT "contamination": estimating the prevalence of LLMs in the scholarly literature
por: Gray, Andrew
Publicado: (2024)

Can news and social media attention reduce the influence of problematic research?
por: Zheng, Er-Te, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

ChatGPT for complex text evaluation tasks
por: Mike Thelwall
Publicado: (2024)

Large Language Models for Departmental Expert Review Quality Scores
por: Langfeldt, Liv, et al.
Publicado: (2026)

Which international co-authorships produce higher quality journal articles?
por: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

FAIR GPT: A virtual consultant for research data management in ChatGPT
por: Shigapov, Renat, et al.
Publicado: (2024)

Where there's a will there's a way: ChatGPT is used more for science in countries where it is prohibited
por: Bao, Honglin, et al.
Publicado: (2024)

Do male leading authors retract more articles than female leading authors?
por: Zheng, Er-Te, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

Assessing the societal influence of academic research with ChatGPT: Impact case study evaluations
por: Kayvan Kousha, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

Delving into the Utilisation of ChatGPT in Scientific Publications in Astronomy
por: Astarita, Simone, et al.
Publicado: (2024)

Is ChatGPT Transforming Academics' Writing Style?
por: Geng, Mingmeng, et al.
Publicado: (2024)

Sentiment Analysis of Citations in Scientific Articles Using ChatGPT: Identifying Potential Biases and Conflicts of Interest
por: Hariri, Walid
Publicado: (2024)

An Experiment with the Use of ChatGPT for LCSH Subject Assignment on Electronic Theses and Dissertations
por: Chow, Eric H. C., et al.
Publicado: (2024)

How is science discussed on Bluesky?
por: Zheng, Er-Te, et al.
Publicado: (2025)