Benchmarking Egocentric Multimodal Goal Inference for Assistive Wearable Agents

Fuente: arXiv
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Veerabadran, Vijay, Xiao, Fanyi, Kamra, Nitin, Matias, Pedro, Chen, Joy, Drooff, Caley, Roads, Brett D, Williams, Riley, Henderson, Ethan, Zhao, Xuanyi, Carlberg, Kevin, Tighe, Joseph, Ridgeway, Karl
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866917042739740672
author Veerabadran, Vijay
Xiao, Fanyi
Kamra, Nitin
Matias, Pedro
Chen, Joy
Drooff, Caley
Roads, Brett D
Williams, Riley
Henderson, Ethan
Zhao, Xuanyi
Carlberg, Kevin
Tighe, Joseph
Ridgeway, Karl
author_facet Veerabadran, Vijay
Xiao, Fanyi
Kamra, Nitin
Matias, Pedro
Chen, Joy
Drooff, Caley
Roads, Brett D
Williams, Riley
Henderson, Ethan
Zhao, Xuanyi
Carlberg, Kevin
Tighe, Joseph
Ridgeway, Karl
contents There has been a surge of interest in assistive wearable agents: agents embodied in wearable form factors (e.g., smart glasses) who take assistive actions toward a user's goal/query (e.g. "Where did I leave my keys?"). In this work, we consider the important complementary problem of inferring that goal from multi-modal contextual observations. Solving this "goal inference" problem holds the promise of eliminating the effort needed to interact with such an agent. This work focuses on creating WAGIBench, a strong benchmark to measure progress in solving this problem using vision-language models (VLMs). Given the limited prior work in this area, we collected a novel dataset comprising 29 hours of multimodal data from 348 participants across 3,477 recordings, featuring ground-truth goals alongside accompanying visual, audio, digital, and longitudinal contextual observations. We validate that human performance exceeds model performance, achieving 93% multiple-choice accuracy compared with 84% for the best-performing VLM. Generative benchmark results that evaluate several families of modern vision-language models show that larger models perform significantly better on the task, yet remain far from practical usefulness, as they produce relevant goals only 55% of the time. Through a modality ablation, we show that models benefit from extra information in relevant modalities with minimal performance degradation from irrelevant modalities.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2510_22443
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Benchmarking Egocentric Multimodal Goal Inference for Assistive Wearable Agents
Veerabadran, Vijay
Xiao, Fanyi
Kamra, Nitin
Matias, Pedro
Chen, Joy
Drooff, Caley
Roads, Brett D
Williams, Riley
Henderson, Ethan
Zhao, Xuanyi
Carlberg, Kevin
Tighe, Joseph
Ridgeway, Karl
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Machine Learning
There has been a surge of interest in assistive wearable agents: agents embodied in wearable form factors (e.g., smart glasses) who take assistive actions toward a user's goal/query (e.g. "Where did I leave my keys?"). In this work, we consider the important complementary problem of inferring that goal from multi-modal contextual observations. Solving this "goal inference" problem holds the promise of eliminating the effort needed to interact with such an agent. This work focuses on creating WAGIBench, a strong benchmark to measure progress in solving this problem using vision-language models (VLMs). Given the limited prior work in this area, we collected a novel dataset comprising 29 hours of multimodal data from 348 participants across 3,477 recordings, featuring ground-truth goals alongside accompanying visual, audio, digital, and longitudinal contextual observations. We validate that human performance exceeds model performance, achieving 93% multiple-choice accuracy compared with 84% for the best-performing VLM. Generative benchmark results that evaluate several families of modern vision-language models show that larger models perform significantly better on the task, yet remain far from practical usefulness, as they produce relevant goals only 55% of the time. Through a modality ablation, we show that models benefit from extra information in relevant modalities with minimal performance degradation from irrelevant modalities.
title Benchmarking Egocentric Multimodal Goal Inference for Assistive Wearable Agents
topic Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.22443