Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jayakumar, Eswari, Dash, Niladri Sekhar, Mukherjee, Debasmita
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.23875
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866915581962223616
author Jayakumar, Eswari
Dash, Niladri Sekhar
Mukherjee, Debasmita
author_facet Jayakumar, Eswari
Dash, Niladri Sekhar
Mukherjee, Debasmita
contents While Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents can be used to create highly engaging interactive applications through prompting personality traits and contextual data, effectively assessing their personalities has proven challenging. This novel interdisciplinary approach addresses this gap by combining agent development and linguistic analysis to assess the prompted personality of LLM-based agents in a poetry explanation task. We developed a novel, flexible question bank, informed by linguistic assessment criteria and human cognitive learning levels, offering a more comprehensive evaluation than current methods. By evaluating agent responses with natural language processing models, other LLMs, and human experts, our findings illustrate the limitations of purely deep learning solutions and emphasize the critical role of interdisciplinary design in agent development.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2510_23875
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Large Language Model Agent Personality and Response Appropriateness: Evaluation by Human Linguistic Experts, LLM-as-Judge, and Natural Language Processing Model
Jayakumar, Eswari
Dash, Niladri Sekhar
Mukherjee, Debasmita
Human-Computer Interaction
While Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents can be used to create highly engaging interactive applications through prompting personality traits and contextual data, effectively assessing their personalities has proven challenging. This novel interdisciplinary approach addresses this gap by combining agent development and linguistic analysis to assess the prompted personality of LLM-based agents in a poetry explanation task. We developed a novel, flexible question bank, informed by linguistic assessment criteria and human cognitive learning levels, offering a more comprehensive evaluation than current methods. By evaluating agent responses with natural language processing models, other LLMs, and human experts, our findings illustrate the limitations of purely deep learning solutions and emphasize the critical role of interdisciplinary design in agent development.
title Large Language Model Agent Personality and Response Appropriateness: Evaluation by Human Linguistic Experts, LLM-as-Judge, and Natural Language Processing Model
topic Human-Computer Interaction
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.23875