Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arhiliuc, Cristina, Guns, Raf, Engels, Tim C. E.
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.24122
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866911236501798912
author Arhiliuc, Cristina
Guns, Raf
Engels, Tim C. E.
author_facet Arhiliuc, Cristina
Guns, Raf
Engels, Tim C. E.
contents This study investigates how different approaches to disciplinary classification represent the Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) in the Flemish VABB-SHW database. We compare organizational classification (based on author affiliation), channel-based cognitive classification (based on publication venues), and text-based publication-level classification (using channel titles, publication titles, and abstracts, depending on availability). The analysis shows that text-based classification generally aligns more closely with channel-based categories, confirming that the channel choice provides relevant information about publication content. At the same time, it is closer to organizational classification than channel-based categories are, suggesting that textual features capture author affiliations more directly than publishing channels do. Comparison across the three systems highlights cases of convergence and divergence, offering insights into how disciplines such as "Sociology" and "History" extend across fields, while "Law" remains more contained. Publication-level classification also clarifies the disciplinary profiles of multidisciplinary journals in the database, which in VABB-SHW show distinctive profiles with stronger emphases on SSH and health sciences. At the journal level, fewer than half of outlets with more than 50 publications have their channel-level classification fully or partially supported by more than 90% of publications. These results demonstrate the added value of text-based methods for validating classifications and for analysing disciplinary dynamics.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2510_24122
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Comparing Disciplinary Classifications in SSH: Organizational, Channel-Based, and Text-Based Perspectives
Arhiliuc, Cristina
Guns, Raf
Engels, Tim C. E.
Digital Libraries
This study investigates how different approaches to disciplinary classification represent the Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) in the Flemish VABB-SHW database. We compare organizational classification (based on author affiliation), channel-based cognitive classification (based on publication venues), and text-based publication-level classification (using channel titles, publication titles, and abstracts, depending on availability). The analysis shows that text-based classification generally aligns more closely with channel-based categories, confirming that the channel choice provides relevant information about publication content. At the same time, it is closer to organizational classification than channel-based categories are, suggesting that textual features capture author affiliations more directly than publishing channels do. Comparison across the three systems highlights cases of convergence and divergence, offering insights into how disciplines such as "Sociology" and "History" extend across fields, while "Law" remains more contained. Publication-level classification also clarifies the disciplinary profiles of multidisciplinary journals in the database, which in VABB-SHW show distinctive profiles with stronger emphases on SSH and health sciences. At the journal level, fewer than half of outlets with more than 50 publications have their channel-level classification fully or partially supported by more than 90% of publications. These results demonstrate the added value of text-based methods for validating classifications and for analysing disciplinary dynamics.
title Comparing Disciplinary Classifications in SSH: Organizational, Channel-Based, and Text-Based Perspectives
topic Digital Libraries
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.24122