Comparing the numbers of subforests and subgraph-degree-tuples

Fuente: arXiv
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shteiner, Sergei, Shteyner, Pavel
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866918179648831488
author Shteiner, Sergei
Shteyner, Pavel
author_facet Shteiner, Sergei
Shteyner, Pavel
contents We enumerate the row-column-sums of all square tridiagonal $(0,1)$-matrices and prove that their count coincides with OEIS A022026 $-$ the number of acyclic subgraphs of the complete $2\times n$ grid graph. We then extend this correspondence in two independent directions: 1. admitting larger sets of matrix entries, and 2. relaxing the tridiagonal support to broader prescribed sparsity patterns. The latter leads us to conjecture that, for any bipartite graph $G$, the number of its acyclic subgraphs equals the number of degree sequences realized by subgraphs of $G$. Moreover, for any non-bipartite graph, the former should be strictly smaller than the latter. We discuss several general approaches and prove these hypotheses for cactus graphs and generalized book graphs.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2510_26936
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Comparing the numbers of subforests and subgraph-degree-tuples
Shteiner, Sergei
Shteyner, Pavel
Combinatorics
05B20 (Primary) 05A19, 05C30, 05C07, 05C15 (Secondary)
We enumerate the row-column-sums of all square tridiagonal $(0,1)$-matrices and prove that their count coincides with OEIS A022026 $-$ the number of acyclic subgraphs of the complete $2\times n$ grid graph. We then extend this correspondence in two independent directions: 1. admitting larger sets of matrix entries, and 2. relaxing the tridiagonal support to broader prescribed sparsity patterns. The latter leads us to conjecture that, for any bipartite graph $G$, the number of its acyclic subgraphs equals the number of degree sequences realized by subgraphs of $G$. Moreover, for any non-bipartite graph, the former should be strictly smaller than the latter. We discuss several general approaches and prove these hypotheses for cactus graphs and generalized book graphs.
title Comparing the numbers of subforests and subgraph-degree-tuples
topic Combinatorics
05B20 (Primary) 05A19, 05C30, 05C07, 05C15 (Secondary)
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.26936