Risk-aware stochastic scheduling of multi-market energy storage systems
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866910194989006848 |
|---|---|
| author | Patrón, Gabriel D. Zhang, Di Ghilardi, Lavinia M. P. Blom, Evelin Goodridge, Maldon Solis, Erik Jahangir, Hamidreza Angarita, Jorge Ganesan, Nandhini West, Kevin Shah, Nilay Tsay, Calvin |
| author_facet | Patrón, Gabriel D. Zhang, Di Ghilardi, Lavinia M. P. Blom, Evelin Goodridge, Maldon Solis, Erik Jahangir, Hamidreza Angarita, Jorge Ganesan, Nandhini West, Kevin Shah, Nilay Tsay, Calvin |
| contents | Energy storage promotes the integration of renewables by operating with charge and discharge policies that balance an intermittent power supply. A key challenge in this emerging sector is how to optimize the operation of storage assets given future price uncertainties and the need to recover the costs of project finance while ensuring an attractive return on equity and hedging against downside risk. This study investigates the scheduling of energy storage assets under price uncertainty, with a focus on electricity markets. A two-stage stochastic risk-constrained approach is employed, whereby electricity price trajectories or specific power markets are observed, allowing for recourse in the schedule. Conditional value-at-risk is used to quantify risk in the optimization problems; this allows for explicit specification of a probabilistic risk limit. The proposed approach is tested in an integrated hydrogen system (IHS) and a battery energy storage system (BESS). In the joint design and operation context for the IHS, the risk constraint results in large installed unit capacities, increasing capital cost but enabling more inventory to buffer price uncertainty. In both case studies, there is an operational trade-off between risk and expected reward; this is reflected in higher expected costs (or lower expected profits) with increasing risk aversion. Despite the decrease in expected reward (up to 500\$k), both systems exhibit substantial benefits of increasing risk aversion (up to 1.5\$mn) with respect to risk-neutral settings. This work provides a general method to address uncertainties in energy storage scheduling, allowing operators to input their level of risk tolerance on asset decisions. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2510_27528 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Risk-aware stochastic scheduling of multi-market energy storage systems Patrón, Gabriel D. Zhang, Di Ghilardi, Lavinia M. P. Blom, Evelin Goodridge, Maldon Solis, Erik Jahangir, Hamidreza Angarita, Jorge Ganesan, Nandhini West, Kevin Shah, Nilay Tsay, Calvin Optimization and Control Systems and Control Risk Management Energy storage promotes the integration of renewables by operating with charge and discharge policies that balance an intermittent power supply. A key challenge in this emerging sector is how to optimize the operation of storage assets given future price uncertainties and the need to recover the costs of project finance while ensuring an attractive return on equity and hedging against downside risk. This study investigates the scheduling of energy storage assets under price uncertainty, with a focus on electricity markets. A two-stage stochastic risk-constrained approach is employed, whereby electricity price trajectories or specific power markets are observed, allowing for recourse in the schedule. Conditional value-at-risk is used to quantify risk in the optimization problems; this allows for explicit specification of a probabilistic risk limit. The proposed approach is tested in an integrated hydrogen system (IHS) and a battery energy storage system (BESS). In the joint design and operation context for the IHS, the risk constraint results in large installed unit capacities, increasing capital cost but enabling more inventory to buffer price uncertainty. In both case studies, there is an operational trade-off between risk and expected reward; this is reflected in higher expected costs (or lower expected profits) with increasing risk aversion. Despite the decrease in expected reward (up to 500\$k), both systems exhibit substantial benefits of increasing risk aversion (up to 1.5\$mn) with respect to risk-neutral settings. This work provides a general method to address uncertainties in energy storage scheduling, allowing operators to input their level of risk tolerance on asset decisions. |
| title | Risk-aware stochastic scheduling of multi-market energy storage systems |
| topic | Optimization and Control Systems and Control Risk Management |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.27528 |