Best Practices for Biorisk Evaluations on Open-Weight Bio-Foundation Models

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wei, Boyi, Che, Zora, Li, Nathaniel, Sehwag, Udari Madhushani, Götting, Jasper, Nedungadi, Samira, Michael, Julian, Yue, Summer, Hendrycks, Dan, Henderson, Peter, Wang, Zifan, Donoughe, Seth, Mazeika, Mantas
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866908668009644032
author Wei, Boyi
Che, Zora
Li, Nathaniel
Sehwag, Udari Madhushani
Götting, Jasper
Nedungadi, Samira
Michael, Julian
Yue, Summer
Hendrycks, Dan
Henderson, Peter
Wang, Zifan
Donoughe, Seth
Mazeika, Mantas
author_facet Wei, Boyi
Che, Zora
Li, Nathaniel
Sehwag, Udari Madhushani
Götting, Jasper
Nedungadi, Samira
Michael, Julian
Yue, Summer
Hendrycks, Dan
Henderson, Peter
Wang, Zifan
Donoughe, Seth
Mazeika, Mantas
contents Open-weight bio-foundation models present a dual-use dilemma. While holding great promise for accelerating scientific research and drug development, they could also enable bad actors to develop more deadly bioweapons. To mitigate the risk posed by these models, current approaches focus on filtering biohazardous data during pre-training. However, the effectiveness of such an approach remains unclear, particularly against determined actors who might fine-tune these models for malicious use. To address this gap, we propose BioRiskEval, a framework to evaluate the robustness of procedures that are intended to reduce the dual-use capabilities of bio-foundation models. BioRiskEval assesses models' virus understanding through three lenses, including sequence modeling, mutational effects prediction, and virulence prediction. Our results show that current filtering practices may not be particularly effective: Excluded knowledge can be rapidly recovered in some cases via fine-tuning, and exhibits broader generalizability in sequence modeling. Furthermore, dual-use signals may already reside in the pretrained representations, and can be elicited via simple linear probing. These findings highlight the challenges of data filtering as a standalone procedure, underscoring the need for further research into robust safety and security strategies for open-weight bio-foundation models.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2510_27629
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Best Practices for Biorisk Evaluations on Open-Weight Bio-Foundation Models
Wei, Boyi
Che, Zora
Li, Nathaniel
Sehwag, Udari Madhushani
Götting, Jasper
Nedungadi, Samira
Michael, Julian
Yue, Summer
Hendrycks, Dan
Henderson, Peter
Wang, Zifan
Donoughe, Seth
Mazeika, Mantas
Cryptography and Security
Artificial Intelligence
Open-weight bio-foundation models present a dual-use dilemma. While holding great promise for accelerating scientific research and drug development, they could also enable bad actors to develop more deadly bioweapons. To mitigate the risk posed by these models, current approaches focus on filtering biohazardous data during pre-training. However, the effectiveness of such an approach remains unclear, particularly against determined actors who might fine-tune these models for malicious use. To address this gap, we propose BioRiskEval, a framework to evaluate the robustness of procedures that are intended to reduce the dual-use capabilities of bio-foundation models. BioRiskEval assesses models' virus understanding through three lenses, including sequence modeling, mutational effects prediction, and virulence prediction. Our results show that current filtering practices may not be particularly effective: Excluded knowledge can be rapidly recovered in some cases via fine-tuning, and exhibits broader generalizability in sequence modeling. Furthermore, dual-use signals may already reside in the pretrained representations, and can be elicited via simple linear probing. These findings highlight the challenges of data filtering as a standalone procedure, underscoring the need for further research into robust safety and security strategies for open-weight bio-foundation models.
title Best Practices for Biorisk Evaluations on Open-Weight Bio-Foundation Models
topic Cryptography and Security
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.27629