Quantifying the radiative response to surface temperature variability: A critical comparison of current methods
Fuente:
arXiv
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2025
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866914526784389120 |
|---|---|
| author | Fredericks, Leif Rugenstein, Maria Thompson, David W. J. Van Loon, Senne Falasca, Fabrizio Basinski-Ferris, Rory Ceppi, Paulo Wu, Quran Bloch-Johnson, Jonah Alessi, Marc Kang, Sarah M. |
| author_facet | Fredericks, Leif Rugenstein, Maria Thompson, David W. J. Van Loon, Senne Falasca, Fabrizio Basinski-Ferris, Rory Ceppi, Paulo Wu, Quran Bloch-Johnson, Jonah Alessi, Marc Kang, Sarah M. |
| contents | Over the past decade, it has become clear that the radiative response to surface temperature change depends on the spatially varying structure in the temperature field, a phenomenon known as the "pattern effect''. The pattern effect is commonly estimated from dedicated climate model simulations forced with local surface temperatures patches (Green's function experiments). Green's function experiments capture causal influences from temperature perturbations, but are computationally expensive to run. Recently, however, several methods have been proposed that estimate the pattern effect through statistical means. These methods can accurately predict the radiative response to temperature variations in climate model simulations. The goal of this paper is to compare methods used to quantify the pattern effect. We apply each method to the same prediction task and discuss its advantages and disadvantages. Most methods indicate large negative feedbacks over the western Pacific. Over other regions, the methods frequently disagree on feedback sign and spatial homogeneity. While all methods yield similar predictions of the global radiative response to surface temperature variations driven by internal variability, they produce very different predictions from the patterns of surface temperature change in simulations forced with increasing CO2 concentrations. We discuss reasons for the discrepancies between methods and recommend paths towards using them in the future to enhance physical understanding of the pattern effect. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2511_00731 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Quantifying the radiative response to surface temperature variability: A critical comparison of current methods Fredericks, Leif Rugenstein, Maria Thompson, David W. J. Van Loon, Senne Falasca, Fabrizio Basinski-Ferris, Rory Ceppi, Paulo Wu, Quran Bloch-Johnson, Jonah Alessi, Marc Kang, Sarah M. Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics Over the past decade, it has become clear that the radiative response to surface temperature change depends on the spatially varying structure in the temperature field, a phenomenon known as the "pattern effect''. The pattern effect is commonly estimated from dedicated climate model simulations forced with local surface temperatures patches (Green's function experiments). Green's function experiments capture causal influences from temperature perturbations, but are computationally expensive to run. Recently, however, several methods have been proposed that estimate the pattern effect through statistical means. These methods can accurately predict the radiative response to temperature variations in climate model simulations. The goal of this paper is to compare methods used to quantify the pattern effect. We apply each method to the same prediction task and discuss its advantages and disadvantages. Most methods indicate large negative feedbacks over the western Pacific. Over other regions, the methods frequently disagree on feedback sign and spatial homogeneity. While all methods yield similar predictions of the global radiative response to surface temperature variations driven by internal variability, they produce very different predictions from the patterns of surface temperature change in simulations forced with increasing CO2 concentrations. We discuss reasons for the discrepancies between methods and recommend paths towards using them in the future to enhance physical understanding of the pattern effect. |
| title | Quantifying the radiative response to surface temperature variability: A critical comparison of current methods |
| topic | Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.00731 |