When Assurance Undermines Intelligence: The Efficiency Costs of Data Governance in AI-Enabled Labor Markets

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chen, Lei, Gao, Chaoyue, Leung, Alvin, Wang, Xiaoning
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866915594796793856
author Chen, Lei
Gao, Chaoyue
Leung, Alvin
Wang, Xiaoning
author_facet Chen, Lei
Gao, Chaoyue
Leung, Alvin
Wang, Xiaoning
contents Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) like Large Language Model (LLM) is increasingly integrated into digital platforms to enhance information access, deliver personalized experiences, and improve matching efficiency. However, these algorithmic advancements rely heavily on large-scale user data, creating a fundamental tension between information assurance-the protection, integrity, and responsible use of privacy data-and artificial intelligence-the learning capacity and predictive accuracy of models. We examine this assurance-intelligence trade-off in the context of LinkedIn, leveraging a regulatory intervention that suspended the use of user data for model training in Hong Kong. Using large-scale employment and job posting data from Revelio Labs and a Difference-in-Differences design, we show that restricting data use significantly reduced GenAI efficiency, leading to lower matching rates, higher employee turnover, and heightened labor market frictions. These effects were especially pronounced for small and fast-growing firms that rely heavily on AI for talent acquisition. Our findings reveal the unintended efficiency costs of well-intentioned data governance and highlight that information assurance, while essential for trust, can undermine intelligence-driven efficiency when misaligned with AI system design. This study contributes to emerging research on AI governance and digital platform by theorizing data assurance as an institutional complement-and potential constraint-to GenAI efficacy in data-intensive environments.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2511_01923
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle When Assurance Undermines Intelligence: The Efficiency Costs of Data Governance in AI-Enabled Labor Markets
Chen, Lei
Gao, Chaoyue
Leung, Alvin
Wang, Xiaoning
Computers and Society
General Economics
Economics
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) like Large Language Model (LLM) is increasingly integrated into digital platforms to enhance information access, deliver personalized experiences, and improve matching efficiency. However, these algorithmic advancements rely heavily on large-scale user data, creating a fundamental tension between information assurance-the protection, integrity, and responsible use of privacy data-and artificial intelligence-the learning capacity and predictive accuracy of models. We examine this assurance-intelligence trade-off in the context of LinkedIn, leveraging a regulatory intervention that suspended the use of user data for model training in Hong Kong. Using large-scale employment and job posting data from Revelio Labs and a Difference-in-Differences design, we show that restricting data use significantly reduced GenAI efficiency, leading to lower matching rates, higher employee turnover, and heightened labor market frictions. These effects were especially pronounced for small and fast-growing firms that rely heavily on AI for talent acquisition. Our findings reveal the unintended efficiency costs of well-intentioned data governance and highlight that information assurance, while essential for trust, can undermine intelligence-driven efficiency when misaligned with AI system design. This study contributes to emerging research on AI governance and digital platform by theorizing data assurance as an institutional complement-and potential constraint-to GenAI efficacy in data-intensive environments.
title When Assurance Undermines Intelligence: The Efficiency Costs of Data Governance in AI-Enabled Labor Markets
topic Computers and Society
General Economics
Economics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.01923