Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.02011 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866917057802534912 |
|---|---|
| author | Meadows, Toby |
| author_facet | Meadows, Toby |
| contents | This paper aims to provide an analysis of what it means when we say that a pair of theories, very generously construed, are equivalent in the sense that they are interdefinable. With regard to theories articulated in first order logic, we already have a natural and well-understood device for addressing this problem: the theory of relative interpretability as based on translation. However, many important theories in the sciences and mathematics (and, in particular, physics) are precisely formulated but are not naturally articulated in first order logic or any obvious language at all. In this paper, we plan to generalize the ordinary theory of interpretation to accommodate such theories by offering an account where definability does not mean definability relative to a particular structure, but rather definability without such reservations: definable in the language of mathematics. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2511_02011 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Found in Translation: at the limits of the Hudetz program Meadows, Toby Logic This paper aims to provide an analysis of what it means when we say that a pair of theories, very generously construed, are equivalent in the sense that they are interdefinable. With regard to theories articulated in first order logic, we already have a natural and well-understood device for addressing this problem: the theory of relative interpretability as based on translation. However, many important theories in the sciences and mathematics (and, in particular, physics) are precisely formulated but are not naturally articulated in first order logic or any obvious language at all. In this paper, we plan to generalize the ordinary theory of interpretation to accommodate such theories by offering an account where definability does not mean definability relative to a particular structure, but rather definability without such reservations: definable in the language of mathematics. |
| title | Found in Translation: at the limits of the Hudetz program |
| topic | Logic |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.02011 |