Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Kellogg, Katherine C., Ye, Bingyang, Hu, Yifan, Savova, Guergana K., Wallace, Byron, Bitterman, Danielle S.
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2025
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.03106
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866915598802354176
author Kellogg, Katherine C.
Ye, Bingyang
Hu, Yifan
Savova, Guergana K.
Wallace, Byron
Bitterman, Danielle S.
author_facet Kellogg, Katherine C.
Ye, Bingyang
Hu, Yifan
Savova, Guergana K.
Wallace, Byron
Bitterman, Danielle S.
contents The rapid adoption of large language models (LLMs) in healthcare has been accompanied by scrutiny of their oversight. Existing monitoring approaches, inherited from traditional machine learning (ML), are task-based and founded on assumed performance degradation arising from dataset drift. In contrast, with LLMs, inevitable model degradation due to changes in populations compared to the training dataset cannot be assumed, because LLMs were not trained for any specific task in any given population. We therefore propose a new organizing principle guiding generalist LLM monitoring that is scalable and grounded in how these models are developed and used in practice: capability-based monitoring. Capability-based monitoring is motivated by the fact that LLMs are generalist systems whose overlapping internal capabilities are reused across numerous downstream tasks. Instead of evaluating each downstream task independently, this approach organizes monitoring around shared model capabilities, such as summarization, reasoning, translation, or safety guardrails, in order to enable cross-task detection of systemic weaknesses, long-tail errors, and emergent behaviors that task-based monitoring may miss. We describe considerations for developers, organizational leaders, and professional societies for implementing a capability-based monitoring approach. Ultimately, capability-based monitoring will provide a scalable foundation for safe, adaptive, and collaborative monitoring of LLMs and future generalist artificial intelligence models in healthcare.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2511_03106
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Large language models require a new form of oversight: capability-based monitoring
Kellogg, Katherine C.
Ye, Bingyang
Hu, Yifan
Savova, Guergana K.
Wallace, Byron
Bitterman, Danielle S.
Artificial Intelligence
The rapid adoption of large language models (LLMs) in healthcare has been accompanied by scrutiny of their oversight. Existing monitoring approaches, inherited from traditional machine learning (ML), are task-based and founded on assumed performance degradation arising from dataset drift. In contrast, with LLMs, inevitable model degradation due to changes in populations compared to the training dataset cannot be assumed, because LLMs were not trained for any specific task in any given population. We therefore propose a new organizing principle guiding generalist LLM monitoring that is scalable and grounded in how these models are developed and used in practice: capability-based monitoring. Capability-based monitoring is motivated by the fact that LLMs are generalist systems whose overlapping internal capabilities are reused across numerous downstream tasks. Instead of evaluating each downstream task independently, this approach organizes monitoring around shared model capabilities, such as summarization, reasoning, translation, or safety guardrails, in order to enable cross-task detection of systemic weaknesses, long-tail errors, and emergent behaviors that task-based monitoring may miss. We describe considerations for developers, organizational leaders, and professional societies for implementing a capability-based monitoring approach. Ultimately, capability-based monitoring will provide a scalable foundation for safe, adaptive, and collaborative monitoring of LLMs and future generalist artificial intelligence models in healthcare.
title Large language models require a new form of oversight: capability-based monitoring
topic Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.03106