Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.05658 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866911255434887168 |
|---|---|
| author | Bryson, Steve Kunimoto, Michelle Belikov, Ruslan Bergsten, Galen J. Bhure, Sakhee Borucki, William J. Caldwell, Douglas A. Chakrabarty, Aritra Fernandes, Rachel B. He, Matthias Y. Jenkins, Jon M. Ment, Kristo Meyer, Michael R. Mulders, Gijs D. Pascucci, Ilaria Plavchan, Peter |
| author_facet | Bryson, Steve Kunimoto, Michelle Belikov, Ruslan Bergsten, Galen J. Bhure, Sakhee Borucki, William J. Caldwell, Douglas A. Chakrabarty, Aritra Fernandes, Rachel B. He, Matthias Y. Jenkins, Jon M. Ment, Kristo Meyer, Michael R. Mulders, Gijs D. Pascucci, Ilaria Plavchan, Peter |
| contents | $η_{\oplus}$, the occurrence rate of rocky habitable zone exoplanets orbiting Sun-like stars, is of great interest to both the astronomical community and the general public. The Kepler space telescope has made it possible to estimate $η_{\oplus}$, but estimates by different groups vary by more than an order of magnitude. We identify several causes for this range of estimates. We first review why, despite being designed to estimate $η_{\oplus}$, Kepler's observations are not sufficient for a high-confidence estimate, due to Kepler's detection limit coinciding with the $η_{\oplus}$ regime. This results in a need to infer $η_{\oplus}$, for example extrapolating from a regime of non-habitable zone, non-rocky exoplanets. We examine two broad classes of causes that can account for the large discrepancy in $η_\oplus$ found in the literature: a) differences in definitions and input data between studies, and b) fundamental limits in Kepler data that lead to large uncertainties and poor accuracy. We highlight the risk of large biases when using extrapolation to describe small exoplanet populations in the habitable zone. We discuss how $η_{\oplus}$ estimates based on Kepler data can be improved, such as reprocessing Kepler data for more complete, higher-reliability detections and better exoplanet catalog characterization. We briefly survey upcoming space telescopes capable of measuring $η_{\oplus}$, and how they can be used to supplement Kepler data. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2511_05658 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Why Estimating $η_\oplus$ is Difficult: A Kepler-Centric Perspective Bryson, Steve Kunimoto, Michelle Belikov, Ruslan Bergsten, Galen J. Bhure, Sakhee Borucki, William J. Caldwell, Douglas A. Chakrabarty, Aritra Fernandes, Rachel B. He, Matthias Y. Jenkins, Jon M. Ment, Kristo Meyer, Michael R. Mulders, Gijs D. Pascucci, Ilaria Plavchan, Peter Earth and Planetary Astrophysics $η_{\oplus}$, the occurrence rate of rocky habitable zone exoplanets orbiting Sun-like stars, is of great interest to both the astronomical community and the general public. The Kepler space telescope has made it possible to estimate $η_{\oplus}$, but estimates by different groups vary by more than an order of magnitude. We identify several causes for this range of estimates. We first review why, despite being designed to estimate $η_{\oplus}$, Kepler's observations are not sufficient for a high-confidence estimate, due to Kepler's detection limit coinciding with the $η_{\oplus}$ regime. This results in a need to infer $η_{\oplus}$, for example extrapolating from a regime of non-habitable zone, non-rocky exoplanets. We examine two broad classes of causes that can account for the large discrepancy in $η_\oplus$ found in the literature: a) differences in definitions and input data between studies, and b) fundamental limits in Kepler data that lead to large uncertainties and poor accuracy. We highlight the risk of large biases when using extrapolation to describe small exoplanet populations in the habitable zone. We discuss how $η_{\oplus}$ estimates based on Kepler data can be improved, such as reprocessing Kepler data for more complete, higher-reliability detections and better exoplanet catalog characterization. We briefly survey upcoming space telescopes capable of measuring $η_{\oplus}$, and how they can be used to supplement Kepler data. |
| title | Why Estimating $η_\oplus$ is Difficult: A Kepler-Centric Perspective |
| topic | Earth and Planetary Astrophysics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.05658 |