What Makes Reasoning Invalid: Echo Reflection Mitigation for Large Language Models

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: He, Chen, Jiang, Xun, Wang, Lei, Yang, Hao, Peng, Chong, Yan, Peng, Shen, Fumin, Xu, Xing
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2025
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866911256050401280
author He, Chen
Jiang, Xun
Wang, Lei
Yang, Hao
Peng, Chong
Yan, Peng
Shen, Fumin
Xu, Xing
author_facet He, Chen
Jiang, Xun
Wang, Lei
Yang, Hao
Peng, Chong
Yan, Peng
Shen, Fumin
Xu, Xing
contents Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across a wide range of reasoning tasks. Recent methods have further improved LLM performance in complex mathematical reasoning. However, when extending these methods beyond the domain of mathematical reasoning to tasks involving complex domain-specific knowledge, we observe a consistent failure of LLMs to generate novel insights during the reflection stage. Instead of conducting genuine cognitive refinement, the model tends to mechanically reiterate earlier reasoning steps without introducing new information or perspectives, a phenomenon referred to as "Echo Reflection". We attribute this behavior to two key defects: (1) Uncontrollable information flow during response generation, which allows premature intermediate thoughts to propagate unchecked and distort final decisions; (2) Insufficient exploration of internal knowledge during reflection, leading to repeating earlier findings rather than generating new cognitive insights. Building on these findings, we proposed a novel reinforcement learning method termed Adaptive Entropy Policy Optimization (AEPO). Specifically, the AEPO framework consists of two major components: (1) Reflection-aware Information Filtration, which quantifies the cognitive information flow and prevents the final answer from being affected by earlier bad cognitive information; (2) Adaptive-Entropy Optimization, which dynamically balances exploration and exploitation across different reasoning stages, promoting both reflective diversity and answer correctness. Extensive experiments demonstrate that AEPO consistently achieves state-of-the-art performance over mainstream reinforcement learning baselines across diverse benchmarks.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2511_06380
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle What Makes Reasoning Invalid: Echo Reflection Mitigation for Large Language Models
He, Chen
Jiang, Xun
Wang, Lei
Yang, Hao
Peng, Chong
Yan, Peng
Shen, Fumin
Xu, Xing
Artificial Intelligence
Machine Learning
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across a wide range of reasoning tasks. Recent methods have further improved LLM performance in complex mathematical reasoning. However, when extending these methods beyond the domain of mathematical reasoning to tasks involving complex domain-specific knowledge, we observe a consistent failure of LLMs to generate novel insights during the reflection stage. Instead of conducting genuine cognitive refinement, the model tends to mechanically reiterate earlier reasoning steps without introducing new information or perspectives, a phenomenon referred to as "Echo Reflection". We attribute this behavior to two key defects: (1) Uncontrollable information flow during response generation, which allows premature intermediate thoughts to propagate unchecked and distort final decisions; (2) Insufficient exploration of internal knowledge during reflection, leading to repeating earlier findings rather than generating new cognitive insights. Building on these findings, we proposed a novel reinforcement learning method termed Adaptive Entropy Policy Optimization (AEPO). Specifically, the AEPO framework consists of two major components: (1) Reflection-aware Information Filtration, which quantifies the cognitive information flow and prevents the final answer from being affected by earlier bad cognitive information; (2) Adaptive-Entropy Optimization, which dynamically balances exploration and exploitation across different reasoning stages, promoting both reflective diversity and answer correctness. Extensive experiments demonstrate that AEPO consistently achieves state-of-the-art performance over mainstream reinforcement learning baselines across diverse benchmarks.
title What Makes Reasoning Invalid: Echo Reflection Mitigation for Large Language Models
topic Artificial Intelligence
Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.06380