Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: More, Abhishek, Zhang, Anthony, Bonilla, Nicole, Vivekan, Ashvik, Zhu, Kevin, Sharafoleslami, Parham, Chaudhary, Maheep
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.06437
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866911256157356032
author More, Abhishek
Zhang, Anthony
Bonilla, Nicole
Vivekan, Ashvik
Zhu, Kevin
Sharafoleslami, Parham
Chaudhary, Maheep
author_facet More, Abhishek
Zhang, Anthony
Bonilla, Nicole
Vivekan, Ashvik
Zhu, Kevin
Sharafoleslami, Parham
Chaudhary, Maheep
contents Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting enables Large Language Models to solve complex problems, but deploying these models safely requires reliable confidence estimates, a capability where existing methods suffer from poor calibration and severe overconfidence on incorrect predictions. We propose Enhanced Dirichlet and Topology Risk (EDTR), a novel decoding strategy that combines topological analysis with Dirichlet-based uncertainty quantification to measure LLM confidence across multiple reasoning paths. EDTR treats each CoT as a vector in high-dimensional space and extracts eight topological risk features capturing the geometric structure of reasoning distributions: tighter, more coherent clusters indicate higher confidence while dispersed, inconsistent paths signal uncertainty. We evaluate EDTR against three state-of-the-art calibration methods across four diverse reasoning benchmarks spanning olympiad-level mathematics (AIME), grade school math (GSM8K), commonsense reasoning, and stock price prediction \cite{zhang2025aime, cobbe2021training, talmor-etal-2019-commonsenseqa, yahoo_finance}. EDTR achieves 41\% better calibration than competing methods with an average ECE of 0.287 and the best overall composite score of 0.672, while notably achieving perfect accuracy on AIME and exceptional calibration on GSM8K with an ECE of 0.107, domains where baselines exhibit severe overconfidence. Our work provides a geometric framework for understanding and quantifying uncertainty in multi-step LLM reasoning, enabling more reliable deployment where calibrated confidence estimates are essential.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2511_06437
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Optimizing Chain-of-Thought Confidence via Topological and Dirichlet Risk Analysis
More, Abhishek
Zhang, Anthony
Bonilla, Nicole
Vivekan, Ashvik
Zhu, Kevin
Sharafoleslami, Parham
Chaudhary, Maheep
Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
Machine Learning
Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting enables Large Language Models to solve complex problems, but deploying these models safely requires reliable confidence estimates, a capability where existing methods suffer from poor calibration and severe overconfidence on incorrect predictions. We propose Enhanced Dirichlet and Topology Risk (EDTR), a novel decoding strategy that combines topological analysis with Dirichlet-based uncertainty quantification to measure LLM confidence across multiple reasoning paths. EDTR treats each CoT as a vector in high-dimensional space and extracts eight topological risk features capturing the geometric structure of reasoning distributions: tighter, more coherent clusters indicate higher confidence while dispersed, inconsistent paths signal uncertainty. We evaluate EDTR against three state-of-the-art calibration methods across four diverse reasoning benchmarks spanning olympiad-level mathematics (AIME), grade school math (GSM8K), commonsense reasoning, and stock price prediction \cite{zhang2025aime, cobbe2021training, talmor-etal-2019-commonsenseqa, yahoo_finance}. EDTR achieves 41\% better calibration than competing methods with an average ECE of 0.287 and the best overall composite score of 0.672, while notably achieving perfect accuracy on AIME and exceptional calibration on GSM8K with an ECE of 0.107, domains where baselines exhibit severe overconfidence. Our work provides a geometric framework for understanding and quantifying uncertainty in multi-step LLM reasoning, enabling more reliable deployment where calibrated confidence estimates are essential.
title Optimizing Chain-of-Thought Confidence via Topological and Dirichlet Risk Analysis
topic Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.06437