Cogent argument extensions are weakly admissible but not vice versa
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866909899675402240 |
|---|---|
| author | Bodanza, Gustavo |
| author_facet | Bodanza, Gustavo |
| contents | In this research note, we show the relationship between two non-admissible argumentation framework semantics: cogent and weakly admissible semantics. We prove that, while cogent extensions are weakly admissible, the converse is not true. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2511_09600 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Cogent argument extensions are weakly admissible but not vice versa Bodanza, Gustavo Artificial Intelligence Logic in Computer Science 68T01, 68T27 F.3; F.m In this research note, we show the relationship between two non-admissible argumentation framework semantics: cogent and weakly admissible semantics. We prove that, while cogent extensions are weakly admissible, the converse is not true. |
| title | Cogent argument extensions are weakly admissible but not vice versa |
| topic | Artificial Intelligence Logic in Computer Science 68T01, 68T27 F.3; F.m |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.09600 |