Assaults on Judicial Independence under the Pretense of Modernization: Evidence from Venezuela

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Garoupa, Nuno, Rosales, Virginia, Spruk, Rok
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866912707511320576
author Garoupa, Nuno
Rosales, Virginia
Spruk, Rok
author_facet Garoupa, Nuno
Rosales, Virginia
Spruk, Rok
contents We investigate how government-orchestrated assaults on the judiciary, disguised as modernization efforts, undermine judicial independence. Our study focuses on Venezuela's constitutional overhaul in the early 2000s, initiated by Hugo Chávez and implemented through a judicial emergency committee. We employ a hybrid synthetic control and difference-in-differences approach to estimate the impact of populist attacks on judicial independence trajectories. By comparing Venezuela to a stable pool of countries without radical constitutional changes, our identification strategy isolates the effect of populist assaults from unobservable confounders and common time trends. Our findings reveal that authoritarian interventions lead to an immediate and lasting breakdown of judicial independence. The deterioration in judicial independence vis-á-vis the estimated counterfactual is robust to variations in the donor pool composition. It does not appear to be driven by pre-existing judicial changes and withstands numerous temporal and spatial placebo checks across over nine million randomly sequenced donor samples.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2511_10681
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Assaults on Judicial Independence under the Pretense of Modernization: Evidence from Venezuela
Garoupa, Nuno
Rosales, Virginia
Spruk, Rok
General Economics
Economics
Econometrics
Applications
We investigate how government-orchestrated assaults on the judiciary, disguised as modernization efforts, undermine judicial independence. Our study focuses on Venezuela's constitutional overhaul in the early 2000s, initiated by Hugo Chávez and implemented through a judicial emergency committee. We employ a hybrid synthetic control and difference-in-differences approach to estimate the impact of populist attacks on judicial independence trajectories. By comparing Venezuela to a stable pool of countries without radical constitutional changes, our identification strategy isolates the effect of populist assaults from unobservable confounders and common time trends. Our findings reveal that authoritarian interventions lead to an immediate and lasting breakdown of judicial independence. The deterioration in judicial independence vis-á-vis the estimated counterfactual is robust to variations in the donor pool composition. It does not appear to be driven by pre-existing judicial changes and withstands numerous temporal and spatial placebo checks across over nine million randomly sequenced donor samples.
title Assaults on Judicial Independence under the Pretense of Modernization: Evidence from Venezuela
topic General Economics
Economics
Econometrics
Applications
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.10681