Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.11484 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866918202146029568 |
|---|---|
| author | Kırmızıgül, Mustafa Erdem Doğruyol, Hasan Feyzi Bayram, Haluk |
| author_facet | Kırmızıgül, Mustafa Erdem Doğruyol, Hasan Feyzi Bayram, Haluk |
| contents | The "Vision Zero" policy, introduced by the Swedish Parliament in 1997, aims to eliminate fatalities and serious injuries resulting from traffic accidents. To achieve this goal, the use of self-driving vehicles in traffic is envisioned and a roadmap for the certification of self-driving vehicles is aimed to be determined. However, it is still unclear how the basic safety requirements that autonomous vehicles must meet will be verified and certified, and which methods will be used. This paper focuses on the comparative evaluation of the prominent methods planned to be used in the certification process of autonomous vehicles. It examines the prominent methods used in the certification process, develops a pipeline for the certification process of autonomous vehicles, and determines the stages, actors, and areas where the addressed methods can be applied. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2511_11484 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | A Comparative Evaluation of Prominent Methods in Autonomous Vehicle Certification Kırmızıgül, Mustafa Erdem Doğruyol, Hasan Feyzi Bayram, Haluk Robotics Computers and Society The "Vision Zero" policy, introduced by the Swedish Parliament in 1997, aims to eliminate fatalities and serious injuries resulting from traffic accidents. To achieve this goal, the use of self-driving vehicles in traffic is envisioned and a roadmap for the certification of self-driving vehicles is aimed to be determined. However, it is still unclear how the basic safety requirements that autonomous vehicles must meet will be verified and certified, and which methods will be used. This paper focuses on the comparative evaluation of the prominent methods planned to be used in the certification process of autonomous vehicles. It examines the prominent methods used in the certification process, develops a pipeline for the certification process of autonomous vehicles, and determines the stages, actors, and areas where the addressed methods can be applied. |
| title | A Comparative Evaluation of Prominent Methods in Autonomous Vehicle Certification |
| topic | Robotics Computers and Society |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.11484 |