Does Scientific Writing Converge to U.S. English? Evidence from Generative AI-Assisted Publications
Fuente:
arXiv
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2025
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866914380436733952 |
|---|---|
| author | Filimonovic, Dragan Rutzer, Christian Macher, Jeffrey Weder, Rolf |
| author_facet | Filimonovic, Dragan Rutzer, Christian Macher, Jeffrey Weder, Rolf |
| contents | A growing literature documents that generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is changing scientific writing, yet most studies focus on absolute changes in vocabulary or readability. An important question remains unanswered: Does GenAI use lead to systematic convergence, or a narrowing of stylistic gaps relative to the dominant form of scientific English? Unlike absolute changes, convergence signals whether language-related publication barriers are declining and suggests broader implications for participation and competition in global science. This study directly addresses this question using 5.65 million English-language scientific articles published from 2021 to 2024 and indexed in Scopus. We measure linguistic similarity to a U.S. benchmark corpus using SciBERT text embeddings, and estimate dynamic changes using an event-study difference-in-differences design with repeated cross-sections centered on the late-2022 release of ChatGPT. We find that GenAI-assisted publications from non-English-speaking countries exhibit statistically significant and increasing convergence toward U.S. scientific English, relative to non-GenAI-assisted publications from these countries. This effect is strongest for domestic author teams from countries more linguistically distant from English and for articles published in lower-impact journals -- precisely the contexts where language barriers have historically been most consequential. The results suggest that GenAI tools are reducing language-related barriers in scientific publications. Whether this represents genuine inclusion or a deepening dependence on a single linguistic standard remains an open question. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2511_11687 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Does Scientific Writing Converge to U.S. English? Evidence from Generative AI-Assisted Publications Filimonovic, Dragan Rutzer, Christian Macher, Jeffrey Weder, Rolf Computers and Society Computation and Language A growing literature documents that generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is changing scientific writing, yet most studies focus on absolute changes in vocabulary or readability. An important question remains unanswered: Does GenAI use lead to systematic convergence, or a narrowing of stylistic gaps relative to the dominant form of scientific English? Unlike absolute changes, convergence signals whether language-related publication barriers are declining and suggests broader implications for participation and competition in global science. This study directly addresses this question using 5.65 million English-language scientific articles published from 2021 to 2024 and indexed in Scopus. We measure linguistic similarity to a U.S. benchmark corpus using SciBERT text embeddings, and estimate dynamic changes using an event-study difference-in-differences design with repeated cross-sections centered on the late-2022 release of ChatGPT. We find that GenAI-assisted publications from non-English-speaking countries exhibit statistically significant and increasing convergence toward U.S. scientific English, relative to non-GenAI-assisted publications from these countries. This effect is strongest for domestic author teams from countries more linguistically distant from English and for articles published in lower-impact journals -- precisely the contexts where language barriers have historically been most consequential. The results suggest that GenAI tools are reducing language-related barriers in scientific publications. Whether this represents genuine inclusion or a deepening dependence on a single linguistic standard remains an open question. |
| title | Does Scientific Writing Converge to U.S. English? Evidence from Generative AI-Assisted Publications |
| topic | Computers and Society Computation and Language |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.11687 |