Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Waegell, Mordecai, McQueen, Kelvin J.
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.12403
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866912712314847232
author Waegell, Mordecai
McQueen, Kelvin J.
author_facet Waegell, Mordecai
McQueen, Kelvin J.
contents According to a common view, Everettian quantum mechanics (EQM) is a local theory because it avoids nonlocal action at a distance, and this is an important point in EQM's favor. Unlike collapse theories, EQM does not allow an action on one system to change the reduced density matrix (RDM) of a remote entangled system - a clear case of nonlocal action. However, EQM does allow an action on one system to change the global state of the system and its remote entangled partners. We argue that such changes should also count as nonlocal actions, meaning EQM is not local after all. First, we consider an argument to the contrary, which deems such global changes to be mere extrinsic changes, whereas nonlocal action requires intrinsic changes to the remote system. We respond that the intrinsic-extrinsic distinction is problematic and cannot hold the weight of this argument. We then try to clarify when actions that change global states count as nonlocal actions. We argue that it is when the global states are essential explanatory mechanisms of the theory. In EQM, the global state is needed to explain why, in an anti-correlated Bell state, Alice's measuring spin-up ensures that she encounters only the branch where Bob measures spin-down.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2511_12403
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Nonlocal action in Everettian Quantum Mechanics
Waegell, Mordecai
McQueen, Kelvin J.
Quantum Physics
According to a common view, Everettian quantum mechanics (EQM) is a local theory because it avoids nonlocal action at a distance, and this is an important point in EQM's favor. Unlike collapse theories, EQM does not allow an action on one system to change the reduced density matrix (RDM) of a remote entangled system - a clear case of nonlocal action. However, EQM does allow an action on one system to change the global state of the system and its remote entangled partners. We argue that such changes should also count as nonlocal actions, meaning EQM is not local after all. First, we consider an argument to the contrary, which deems such global changes to be mere extrinsic changes, whereas nonlocal action requires intrinsic changes to the remote system. We respond that the intrinsic-extrinsic distinction is problematic and cannot hold the weight of this argument. We then try to clarify when actions that change global states count as nonlocal actions. We argue that it is when the global states are essential explanatory mechanisms of the theory. In EQM, the global state is needed to explain why, in an anti-correlated Bell state, Alice's measuring spin-up ensures that she encounters only the branch where Bob measures spin-down.
title Nonlocal action in Everettian Quantum Mechanics
topic Quantum Physics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.12403