Pixels or Positions? Benchmarking Modalities in Group Activity Recognition
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866915946656956416 |
|---|---|
| author | Karki, Drishya Ramazanova, Merey Cioppa, Anthony Giancola, Silvio Ghanem, Bernard |
| author_facet | Karki, Drishya Ramazanova, Merey Cioppa, Anthony Giancola, Silvio Ghanem, Bernard |
| contents | Group Activity Recognition (GAR) is well studied on the video modality for surveillance and indoor team sports (e.g., volleyball, basketball). Yet, other modalities such as agent positions and trajectories over time, i.e. tracking, remain comparatively under-explored despite being compact, agent-centric signals that explicitly encode spatial interactions. Understanding whether pixel (video) or position (tracking) modalities leads to better group activity recognition is therefore important to drive further research on the topic. However, no standardized benchmark currently exists that aligns broadcast video and tracking data for the same group activities, leading to a lack of apples-to-apples comparison between these modalities for GAR. In this work, we introduce SoccerNet-GAR, a multimodal dataset built from the $64$ matches of the football World Cup 2022. Specifically, the broadcast videos and player tracking modalities for $87{,}939$ group activities are synchronized and annotated with $10$ categories. Furthermore, we define a unified evaluation protocol to benchmark two strong unimodal approaches: (i) competitive video-based classifiers and (ii) tracking-based classifiers leveraging graph neural networks. In particular, our novel role-aware graph architecture for tracking-based GAR directly encodes tactical structure through positional edges connecting players by their on-pitch roles. Our tracking model achieves $77.8\%$ balanced accuracy compared to $60.9\%$ for the best video baseline, while training with $7 \times$ less GPU hours and $479 \times$ fewer parameters ($180K$ vs. $86.3M$). This study provides new insights into the relative strengths of pixels and positions for group activity recognition in sports. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2511_12606 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Pixels or Positions? Benchmarking Modalities in Group Activity Recognition Karki, Drishya Ramazanova, Merey Cioppa, Anthony Giancola, Silvio Ghanem, Bernard Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Group Activity Recognition (GAR) is well studied on the video modality for surveillance and indoor team sports (e.g., volleyball, basketball). Yet, other modalities such as agent positions and trajectories over time, i.e. tracking, remain comparatively under-explored despite being compact, agent-centric signals that explicitly encode spatial interactions. Understanding whether pixel (video) or position (tracking) modalities leads to better group activity recognition is therefore important to drive further research on the topic. However, no standardized benchmark currently exists that aligns broadcast video and tracking data for the same group activities, leading to a lack of apples-to-apples comparison between these modalities for GAR. In this work, we introduce SoccerNet-GAR, a multimodal dataset built from the $64$ matches of the football World Cup 2022. Specifically, the broadcast videos and player tracking modalities for $87{,}939$ group activities are synchronized and annotated with $10$ categories. Furthermore, we define a unified evaluation protocol to benchmark two strong unimodal approaches: (i) competitive video-based classifiers and (ii) tracking-based classifiers leveraging graph neural networks. In particular, our novel role-aware graph architecture for tracking-based GAR directly encodes tactical structure through positional edges connecting players by their on-pitch roles. Our tracking model achieves $77.8\%$ balanced accuracy compared to $60.9\%$ for the best video baseline, while training with $7 \times$ less GPU hours and $479 \times$ fewer parameters ($180K$ vs. $86.3M$). This study provides new insights into the relative strengths of pixels and positions for group activity recognition in sports. |
| title | Pixels or Positions? Benchmarking Modalities in Group Activity Recognition |
| topic | Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.12606 |