How much can we save? Upper bound cost and emissions benefits from commercial and industrial load flexibility
Fuente:
arXiv
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2025
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866917090373402624 |
|---|---|
| author | Rao, Akshay K. Chapin, Fletcher T. Musabandesu, Erin Sakthivelu, Adhithyan Tucker, Carson Wettermark, Daly Mauter, Meagan S. |
| author_facet | Rao, Akshay K. Chapin, Fletcher T. Musabandesu, Erin Sakthivelu, Adhithyan Tucker, Carson Wettermark, Daly Mauter, Meagan S. |
| contents | Load shifting by commercial and industrial power consumers reduces costs and Scope 2 emissions for the consumer and the grid. Incentivizing this behavior requires tools for valuing flexibility amidst the heterogeneity in load characteristics across diverse sectors and the spatiotemporal variation in electricity prices and emissions factors. This work presents a top-down approach to screen and broadly understand the benefits of flexibility based on system uptime, power capacity (PC), energy capacity (EC), and round- trip efficiency (RTE). Depending on the region and season, cost savings from flexibility range from 0 to over 100% and emissions savings are generally bounded between 5-40%. We also find the magnitude and cost of emissions abatement from flexibility is highly variable and, in some cases, up to four orders of magnitude less than regional renewable energy credits or common investing or policy benchmarks like the social cost of carbon. While the value of flexibility is highly dynamic, estimating savings as a function of load characteristics and incentives can inform heuristic design of new systems, siting strategies, comparison of flexibility to other decarbonization options, and new avenues for incentivizing flexibility. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2511_14928 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | How much can we save? Upper bound cost and emissions benefits from commercial and industrial load flexibility Rao, Akshay K. Chapin, Fletcher T. Musabandesu, Erin Sakthivelu, Adhithyan Tucker, Carson Wettermark, Daly Mauter, Meagan S. Systems and Control Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science Load shifting by commercial and industrial power consumers reduces costs and Scope 2 emissions for the consumer and the grid. Incentivizing this behavior requires tools for valuing flexibility amidst the heterogeneity in load characteristics across diverse sectors and the spatiotemporal variation in electricity prices and emissions factors. This work presents a top-down approach to screen and broadly understand the benefits of flexibility based on system uptime, power capacity (PC), energy capacity (EC), and round- trip efficiency (RTE). Depending on the region and season, cost savings from flexibility range from 0 to over 100% and emissions savings are generally bounded between 5-40%. We also find the magnitude and cost of emissions abatement from flexibility is highly variable and, in some cases, up to four orders of magnitude less than regional renewable energy credits or common investing or policy benchmarks like the social cost of carbon. While the value of flexibility is highly dynamic, estimating savings as a function of load characteristics and incentives can inform heuristic design of new systems, siting strategies, comparison of flexibility to other decarbonization options, and new avenues for incentivizing flexibility. |
| title | How much can we save? Upper bound cost and emissions benefits from commercial and industrial load flexibility |
| topic | Systems and Control Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.14928 |