What Does It Take to Be a Good AI Research Agent? Studying the Role of Ideation Diversity
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866909951643877376 |
|---|---|
| author | Audran-Reiss, Alexis Armengol-Estapé, Jordi Hambardzumyan, Karen Budhiraja, Amar Josifoski, Martin Toledo, Edan Hazra, Rishi Magka, Despoina Shvartsman, Michael Pathak, Parth Kao, Justine T Cipolina-Kun, Lucia Gauri, Bhavul Gagnon-Audet, Jean-Christophe Tewolde, Emanuel Zhang, Jenny Cohen, Taco Adi, Yossi Shavrina, Tatiana Bachrach, Yoram |
| author_facet | Audran-Reiss, Alexis Armengol-Estapé, Jordi Hambardzumyan, Karen Budhiraja, Amar Josifoski, Martin Toledo, Edan Hazra, Rishi Magka, Despoina Shvartsman, Michael Pathak, Parth Kao, Justine T Cipolina-Kun, Lucia Gauri, Bhavul Gagnon-Audet, Jean-Christophe Tewolde, Emanuel Zhang, Jenny Cohen, Taco Adi, Yossi Shavrina, Tatiana Bachrach, Yoram |
| contents | AI research agents offer the promise to accelerate scientific progress by automating the design, implementation, and training of machine learning models. However, the field is still in its infancy, and the key factors driving the success or failure of agent trajectories are not fully understood. We examine the role that ideation diversity plays in agent performance. First, we analyse agent trajectories on MLE-bench, a well-known benchmark to evaluate AI research agents, across different models and agent scaffolds. Our analysis reveals that different models and agent scaffolds yield varying degrees of ideation diversity, and that higher-performing agents tend to have increased ideation diversity. Further, we run a controlled experiment where we modify the degree of ideation diversity, demonstrating that higher ideation diversity results in stronger performance. Finally, we strengthen our results by examining additional evaluation metrics beyond the standard medal-based scoring of MLE-bench, showing that our findings still hold across other agent performance metrics. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2511_15593 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | What Does It Take to Be a Good AI Research Agent? Studying the Role of Ideation Diversity Audran-Reiss, Alexis Armengol-Estapé, Jordi Hambardzumyan, Karen Budhiraja, Amar Josifoski, Martin Toledo, Edan Hazra, Rishi Magka, Despoina Shvartsman, Michael Pathak, Parth Kao, Justine T Cipolina-Kun, Lucia Gauri, Bhavul Gagnon-Audet, Jean-Christophe Tewolde, Emanuel Zhang, Jenny Cohen, Taco Adi, Yossi Shavrina, Tatiana Bachrach, Yoram Artificial Intelligence AI research agents offer the promise to accelerate scientific progress by automating the design, implementation, and training of machine learning models. However, the field is still in its infancy, and the key factors driving the success or failure of agent trajectories are not fully understood. We examine the role that ideation diversity plays in agent performance. First, we analyse agent trajectories on MLE-bench, a well-known benchmark to evaluate AI research agents, across different models and agent scaffolds. Our analysis reveals that different models and agent scaffolds yield varying degrees of ideation diversity, and that higher-performing agents tend to have increased ideation diversity. Further, we run a controlled experiment where we modify the degree of ideation diversity, demonstrating that higher ideation diversity results in stronger performance. Finally, we strengthen our results by examining additional evaluation metrics beyond the standard medal-based scoring of MLE-bench, showing that our findings still hold across other agent performance metrics. |
| title | What Does It Take to Be a Good AI Research Agent? Studying the Role of Ideation Diversity |
| topic | Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.15593 |