Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chulo, Ivan, Joshi, Ananya
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.15895
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866909914263191552
author Chulo, Ivan
Joshi, Ananya
author_facet Chulo, Ivan
Joshi, Ananya
contents Recent work shows activation steering substantially improves language models' Theory of Mind (ToM) (Bortoletto et al. 2024), yet the mechanisms of what changes occur internally that leads to different outputs remains unclear. We propose decomposing ToM in LLMs by comparing steered versus baseline LLMs' activations using linear probes trained on 45 cognitive actions. We applied Contrastive Activation Addition (CAA) steering to Gemma-3-4B and evaluated it on 1,000 BigToM forward belief scenarios (Gandhi et al. 2023), we find improved performance on belief attribution tasks (32.5\% to 46.7\% accuracy) is mediated by activations processing emotional content : emotion perception (+2.23), emotion valuing (+2.20), while suppressing analytical processes: questioning (-0.78), convergent thinking (-1.59). This suggests that successful ToM abilities in LLMs are mediated by emotional understanding, not analytical reasoning.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2511_15895
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Decomposing Theory of Mind: How Emotional Processing Mediates ToM Abilities in LLMs
Chulo, Ivan
Joshi, Ananya
Artificial Intelligence
Recent work shows activation steering substantially improves language models' Theory of Mind (ToM) (Bortoletto et al. 2024), yet the mechanisms of what changes occur internally that leads to different outputs remains unclear. We propose decomposing ToM in LLMs by comparing steered versus baseline LLMs' activations using linear probes trained on 45 cognitive actions. We applied Contrastive Activation Addition (CAA) steering to Gemma-3-4B and evaluated it on 1,000 BigToM forward belief scenarios (Gandhi et al. 2023), we find improved performance on belief attribution tasks (32.5\% to 46.7\% accuracy) is mediated by activations processing emotional content : emotion perception (+2.23), emotion valuing (+2.20), while suppressing analytical processes: questioning (-0.78), convergent thinking (-1.59). This suggests that successful ToM abilities in LLMs are mediated by emotional understanding, not analytical reasoning.
title Decomposing Theory of Mind: How Emotional Processing Mediates ToM Abilities in LLMs
topic Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.15895