Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.15952 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866917093979455488 |
|---|---|
| author | Li, Chengyu Faghfoorian, Saleh Ruchkin, Ivan |
| author_facet | Li, Chengyu Faghfoorian, Saleh Ruchkin, Ivan |
| contents | Formal guarantees for cyber-physical systems (CPS) rely on diverse assumptions. If satisfied, these assumptions enable the transfer of abstract guarantees into real-world assurances about the deployed CPS. Although assumptions are central to assured CPS, there is little systematic knowledge about what assumptions are made, what guarantees they support, and what it would take to specify them precisely. To fill this gap, we present a survey of assumptions and guarantees in the control, verification, and runtime assurance areas of CPS literature. From 104 papers over a 10-year span (2014-2024), we extracted 423 assumptions and 321 guarantees using grounded-theory coding. We also annotated the assumptions with 21 tags indicating elementary language features needed for specifications. Our analysis highlighted prevalent trends and gaps in CPS assumptions, particularly related to initialization, sensing, perception, neural components, and uncertainty. Our observations culminated in a call to action on reporting and testing CPS assumptions. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2511_15952 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | What Does It Take to Get Guarantees? Systematizing Assumptions in Cyber-Physical Systems Li, Chengyu Faghfoorian, Saleh Ruchkin, Ivan Systems and Control Formal guarantees for cyber-physical systems (CPS) rely on diverse assumptions. If satisfied, these assumptions enable the transfer of abstract guarantees into real-world assurances about the deployed CPS. Although assumptions are central to assured CPS, there is little systematic knowledge about what assumptions are made, what guarantees they support, and what it would take to specify them precisely. To fill this gap, we present a survey of assumptions and guarantees in the control, verification, and runtime assurance areas of CPS literature. From 104 papers over a 10-year span (2014-2024), we extracted 423 assumptions and 321 guarantees using grounded-theory coding. We also annotated the assumptions with 21 tags indicating elementary language features needed for specifications. Our analysis highlighted prevalent trends and gaps in CPS assumptions, particularly related to initialization, sensing, perception, neural components, and uncertainty. Our observations culminated in a call to action on reporting and testing CPS assumptions. |
| title | What Does It Take to Get Guarantees? Systematizing Assumptions in Cyber-Physical Systems |
| topic | Systems and Control |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.15952 |