REFLECTing SPERET: Measuring and Promoting Ethics and Privacy Reflexivity in Eye-Tracking Research
Fuente:
arXiv
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2025
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866918216331165696 |
|---|---|
| author | Hindennach, Susanne Elfares, Mayar Gressel, Céline Bulling, Andreas |
| author_facet | Hindennach, Susanne Elfares, Mayar Gressel, Céline Bulling, Andreas |
| contents | The proliferation of eye tracking in high-stakes domains - such as healthcare, marketing and surveillance - underscores the need for researchers to be ethically aware when employing this technology. Although privacy and ethical guidelines have emerged in recent years, empirical research on how scholars reflect on their own work remains scarce. To address this gap, we present two complementary instruments developed with input from more than 70 researchers: REFLECT, a qualitative questionnaire, and SPERET (Latin for "hope"), a quantitative psychometric scale that measures privacy and ethics reflexivity in eye tracking. Our findings reveal a research community that is concerned about user privacy, cognisant of methodological constraints, such as sample bias, and that possesses a nuanced sense of ethical responsibility evolving with project maturity. Together, these tools and our analyses offer a systematic examination and a hopeful outlook on reflexivity in eye-tracking research, promoting more privacy and ethics-conscious practice. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2511_18965 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | REFLECTing SPERET: Measuring and Promoting Ethics and Privacy Reflexivity in Eye-Tracking Research Hindennach, Susanne Elfares, Mayar Gressel, Céline Bulling, Andreas Human-Computer Interaction The proliferation of eye tracking in high-stakes domains - such as healthcare, marketing and surveillance - underscores the need for researchers to be ethically aware when employing this technology. Although privacy and ethical guidelines have emerged in recent years, empirical research on how scholars reflect on their own work remains scarce. To address this gap, we present two complementary instruments developed with input from more than 70 researchers: REFLECT, a qualitative questionnaire, and SPERET (Latin for "hope"), a quantitative psychometric scale that measures privacy and ethics reflexivity in eye tracking. Our findings reveal a research community that is concerned about user privacy, cognisant of methodological constraints, such as sample bias, and that possesses a nuanced sense of ethical responsibility evolving with project maturity. Together, these tools and our analyses offer a systematic examination and a hopeful outlook on reflexivity in eye-tracking research, promoting more privacy and ethics-conscious practice. |
| title | REFLECTing SPERET: Measuring and Promoting Ethics and Privacy Reflexivity in Eye-Tracking Research |
| topic | Human-Computer Interaction |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.18965 |