Bug Detective and Quality Coach: Developers' Mental Models of AI-Assisted IDE Tools
Fuente:
arXiv
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866918218718773248 |
|---|---|
| author | Buono, Paolo Cerullo, Mary Cirillo, Stefano Desolda, Giuseppe Greco, Francesco Guglielmi, Emanuela Margarella, Grazia Polese, Giuseppe Scalabrino, Simone Tucci, Cesare |
| author_facet | Buono, Paolo Cerullo, Mary Cirillo, Stefano Desolda, Giuseppe Greco, Francesco Guglielmi, Emanuela Margarella, Grazia Polese, Giuseppe Scalabrino, Simone Tucci, Cesare |
| contents | AI-assisted tools support developers in performing cognitively demanding tasks such as bug detection and code readability assessment. Despite the advancements in the technical characteristics of these tools, little is known about how developers mentally model them and how mismatches affect trust, control, and adoption. We conducted six co-design workshops with 58 developers to elicit their mental models about AI-assisted bug detection and readability features. It emerged that developers conceive bug detection tools as \textit{bug detectives}, which warn users only in case of critical issues, guaranteeing transparency, actionable feedback, and confidence cues. Readability assessment tools, on the other hand, are envisioned as \textit{quality coaches}, which provide contextual, personalized, and progressive guidance. Trust, in both tasks, depends on the clarity of explanations, timing, and user control. A set of design principles for Human-Centered AI in IDEs has been distilled, aiming to balance disruption with support, conciseness with depth, and automation with human agency. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2511_21197 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Bug Detective and Quality Coach: Developers' Mental Models of AI-Assisted IDE Tools Buono, Paolo Cerullo, Mary Cirillo, Stefano Desolda, Giuseppe Greco, Francesco Guglielmi, Emanuela Margarella, Grazia Polese, Giuseppe Scalabrino, Simone Tucci, Cesare Software Engineering Human-Computer Interaction AI-assisted tools support developers in performing cognitively demanding tasks such as bug detection and code readability assessment. Despite the advancements in the technical characteristics of these tools, little is known about how developers mentally model them and how mismatches affect trust, control, and adoption. We conducted six co-design workshops with 58 developers to elicit their mental models about AI-assisted bug detection and readability features. It emerged that developers conceive bug detection tools as \textit{bug detectives}, which warn users only in case of critical issues, guaranteeing transparency, actionable feedback, and confidence cues. Readability assessment tools, on the other hand, are envisioned as \textit{quality coaches}, which provide contextual, personalized, and progressive guidance. Trust, in both tasks, depends on the clarity of explanations, timing, and user control. A set of design principles for Human-Centered AI in IDEs has been distilled, aiming to balance disruption with support, conciseness with depth, and automation with human agency. |
| title | Bug Detective and Quality Coach: Developers' Mental Models of AI-Assisted IDE Tools |
| topic | Software Engineering Human-Computer Interaction |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.21197 |