47B Mixture-of-Experts Beats 671B Dense Models on Chinese Medical Examinations

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tseng, Chiung-Yi, Zhang, Danyang, Wang, Tianyang, Luo, Hongying, Chen, Lu, Huang, Junming, Guan, Jibin, Hao, Junfeng, Song, Junhao, Song, Xinyuan, Bi, Ziqian
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866909975187554304
author Tseng, Chiung-Yi
Zhang, Danyang
Wang, Tianyang
Luo, Hongying
Chen, Lu
Huang, Junming
Guan, Jibin
Hao, Junfeng
Song, Junhao
Song, Xinyuan
Bi, Ziqian
author_facet Tseng, Chiung-Yi
Zhang, Danyang
Wang, Tianyang
Luo, Hongying
Chen, Lu
Huang, Junming
Guan, Jibin
Hao, Junfeng
Song, Junhao
Song, Xinyuan
Bi, Ziqian
contents The rapid advancement of large language models(LLMs) has prompted significant interest in their potential applications in medical domains. This paper presents a comprehensive benchmark evaluation of 27 state-of-the-art LLMs on Chinese medical examination questions, encompassing seven medical specialties across two professional levels. We introduce a robust evaluation framework that assesses model performance on 2,800 carefully curated questions from cardiovascular, gastroenterology, hematology, infectious diseases, nephrology, neurology, and respiratory medicine domains. Our dataset distinguishes between attending physician and senior physician difficulty levels, providing nuanced insights into model capabilities across varying complexity. Our empirical analysis reveals substantial performance variations among models, with Mixtral-8x7B achieving the highest overall accuracy of 74.25%, followed by DeepSeek-R1-671B at 64.07%. Notably, we observe no consistent correlation between model size and performance, as evidenced by the strong performance of smaller mixture-of-experts architectures. The evaluation demonstrates significant performance gaps between medical specialties, with models generally performing better on cardiovascular and neurology questions compared to gastroenterology and nephrology domains. Furthermore, our analysis indicates minimal performance degradation between attending and senior physician levels for top-performing models, suggesting robust generalization capabilities. This benchmark provides critical insights for the deployment of LLMs in medical education and clinical decision support systems, highlighting both the promise and current limitations of these technologies in specialized medical contexts.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2511_21701
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle 47B Mixture-of-Experts Beats 671B Dense Models on Chinese Medical Examinations
Tseng, Chiung-Yi
Zhang, Danyang
Wang, Tianyang
Luo, Hongying
Chen, Lu
Huang, Junming
Guan, Jibin
Hao, Junfeng
Song, Junhao
Song, Xinyuan
Bi, Ziqian
Computation and Language
Machine Learning
The rapid advancement of large language models(LLMs) has prompted significant interest in their potential applications in medical domains. This paper presents a comprehensive benchmark evaluation of 27 state-of-the-art LLMs on Chinese medical examination questions, encompassing seven medical specialties across two professional levels. We introduce a robust evaluation framework that assesses model performance on 2,800 carefully curated questions from cardiovascular, gastroenterology, hematology, infectious diseases, nephrology, neurology, and respiratory medicine domains. Our dataset distinguishes between attending physician and senior physician difficulty levels, providing nuanced insights into model capabilities across varying complexity. Our empirical analysis reveals substantial performance variations among models, with Mixtral-8x7B achieving the highest overall accuracy of 74.25%, followed by DeepSeek-R1-671B at 64.07%. Notably, we observe no consistent correlation between model size and performance, as evidenced by the strong performance of smaller mixture-of-experts architectures. The evaluation demonstrates significant performance gaps between medical specialties, with models generally performing better on cardiovascular and neurology questions compared to gastroenterology and nephrology domains. Furthermore, our analysis indicates minimal performance degradation between attending and senior physician levels for top-performing models, suggesting robust generalization capabilities. This benchmark provides critical insights for the deployment of LLMs in medical education and clinical decision support systems, highlighting both the promise and current limitations of these technologies in specialized medical contexts.
title 47B Mixture-of-Experts Beats 671B Dense Models on Chinese Medical Examinations
topic Computation and Language
Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.21701