Does cross-modal discounting generalize to non-WEIRD cultures? A comparison of the USA and Japan

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yamamoto, Shohei, McDonald, Rebecca, Read, Daniel
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866909931608735744
author Yamamoto, Shohei
McDonald, Rebecca
Read, Daniel
author_facet Yamamoto, Shohei
McDonald, Rebecca
Read, Daniel
contents This paper examines how outcome modality in intertemporal choice influences time preferences and whether the process differs across cultures, specifically Japan and the United States. Uni-modal choices are those when the outcomes being compared over time are very similar, and cross-modal choices are those when the outcomes are very different. The cross-modal effect, previously shown in the U.S., is that there is greater patience in cross-modal decisions. In Experiment 1, we employed a between-participants design, in which participants either made uni-modal or cross-modal decisions. In Experiment 2, we employed a within-participants design in which everyone made both types of decision. In both Experiments we replicated the cross-modal effect. Moreover, the magnitude of the effect did not vary with factors known to relate to time preference, such as cognitive ability and social status, and it did not differ across cultures, even though Japanese participants were much more patient than American ones. The effect was stronger in the between- than within-participants experiment. These results strengthen the conclusion that the cross-modal effect is universal and strengthens the argument that it is due to the fundamental process of attentional dilution.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2511_23126
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Does cross-modal discounting generalize to non-WEIRD cultures? A comparison of the USA and Japan
Yamamoto, Shohei
McDonald, Rebecca
Read, Daniel
General Economics
Economics
This paper examines how outcome modality in intertemporal choice influences time preferences and whether the process differs across cultures, specifically Japan and the United States. Uni-modal choices are those when the outcomes being compared over time are very similar, and cross-modal choices are those when the outcomes are very different. The cross-modal effect, previously shown in the U.S., is that there is greater patience in cross-modal decisions. In Experiment 1, we employed a between-participants design, in which participants either made uni-modal or cross-modal decisions. In Experiment 2, we employed a within-participants design in which everyone made both types of decision. In both Experiments we replicated the cross-modal effect. Moreover, the magnitude of the effect did not vary with factors known to relate to time preference, such as cognitive ability and social status, and it did not differ across cultures, even though Japanese participants were much more patient than American ones. The effect was stronger in the between- than within-participants experiment. These results strengthen the conclusion that the cross-modal effect is universal and strengthens the argument that it is due to the fundamental process of attentional dilution.
title Does cross-modal discounting generalize to non-WEIRD cultures? A comparison of the USA and Japan
topic General Economics
Economics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.23126