Cover Image

ML Researchers Support Openness in Peer Review But Are Concerned About Resubmission Bias

Fuente: arXiv

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Rao, Vishisht, Payan, Justin, McCallum, Andrew, Shah, Nihar B.
Format:	Preprint
Published:	2025
Subjects:	Digital Libraries
Online Access:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

Detecting LLM-Generated Peer Reviews
by: Rao, Vishisht, et al.
Published: (2025)

FLAWS: A Benchmark for Error Identification and Localization in Scientific Papers
by: Xi, Sarina, et al.
Published: (2025)

Identity Theft in AI Conference Peer Review
by: Shah, Nihar B., et al.
Published: (2025)

Vulnerability of Text-Matching in ML/AI Conference Reviewer Assignments to Collusions
by: Hsieh, Jhih-Yi, et al.
Published: (2024)

Causal Effect of Group Diversity on Redundancy and Coverage in Peer-Reviewing
by: Goyal, Navita, et al.
Published: (2024)

Enhancing Peer Review in Astronomy: A Machine Learning and Optimization Approach to Reviewer Assignments for ALMA
by: Carpenter, John M., et al.
Published: (2024)

Peer Reviews of Peer Reviews: A Randomized Controlled Trial and Other Experiments
by: Goldberg, Alexander, et al.
Published: (2023)

A Randomized Controlled Trial on Anonymizing Reviewers to Each Other in Peer Review Discussions
by: Rastogi, Charvi, et al.
Published: (2024)

The More You Automate, the Less You See: Hidden Pitfalls of AI Scientist Systems
by: Luo, Ziming, et al.
Published: (2025)

R-Index: A Metric for Assessing Researcher Contributions to Peer Review
by: Malekzadeh, Milad
Published: (2024)

A Gold Standard Dataset for the Reviewer Assignment Problem
by: Stelmakh, Ivan, et al.
Published: (2023)

ARA: Agentic Reproducibility Assessment For Scalable Support Of Scientific Peer-Review
by: Riehl, Kevin, et al.
Published: (2026)

On The Peer Review Reports: Does Size Matter?
by: Maddi, Abdelghani, et al.
Published: (2024)

Deferred Acceptance Algorithm Improves Peer Review Process
by: Bartneck, Christoph, et al.
Published: (2026)

Rejoinder: The ICML 2023 Ranking Experiment: Examining Author Self-Assessment in ML/AI Peer Review
by: Su, Buxin, et al.
Published: (2026)

To ArXiv or not to ArXiv: A Study Quantifying Pros and Cons of Posting Preprints Online
by: Rastogi, Charvi, et al.
Published: (2022)

Who Are Tweeting About Academic Publications? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Altmetric Studies
by: Maleki, Ashraf, et al.
Published: (2023)

Can Large Language Models Evaluate Grant Proposal Quality? Revisiting the Wennerås and Wold Peer Review Data
by: Sandström, Ulf, et al.
Published: (2026)

Trends in Practical Student Peer-review
by: Purchase, Helen C., et al.
Published: (2024)

Open Research Data in Spanish University Repositories
by: Monteagudo-Haro, Pablo, et al.
Published: (2024)

Lowering the Cost of Diamond Open Access Journals
by: Bos, Joppe, et al.
Published: (2025)

zbMATH Open: API Solutions and Research Challenges
by: Petrera, Matteo, et al.
Published: (2021)

Gender and Discipline Shape Length, Content and Tone of Grant Peer Review Reports
by: Müller, Stefan, et al.
Published: (2025)

The ICML 2023 Ranking Experiment: Examining Author Self-Assessment in ML/AI Peer Review
by: Su, Buxin, et al.
Published: (2024)

Research on Diamond Open Access in the Long Shadow of Science Policy
by: Taubert, Niels
Published: (2025)

Organizing Scientific Knowledge From Energy System Research Using the Open Research Knowledge Graph
by: Karras, Oliver, et al.
Published: (2024)

What Large-Scale Publication and Citation Data Tell Us About International Research Collaboration in Europe: Changing National Patterns in Global Contexts
by: Kwiek, Marek
Published: (2023)

LLM-Based Information Extraction to Support Scientific Literature Research and Publication Workflows
by: Ateia, Samy, et al.
Published: (2025)

Assessing the impact of Open Research Information Infrastructures using NLP driven full-text Scientometrics: A case study of the LXCat open-access platform
by: Pandya, Kalp, et al.
Published: (2026)

Extracting Information About Publication Venues Using Citation-Informed Transformers
by: Zimmerman, Brian D., et al.
Published: (2025)

Evaluating the Predictive Capacity of ChatGPT for Academic Peer Review Outcomes Across Multiple Platforms
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2024)

Is OpenAlex Suitable for Research Quality Evaluation and Which Citation Indicator is Best?
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2025)

Mapping the Landscape of Open Access Dashboards -- A Dataset for Research and Infrastructure Development
by: Schneider, Johannes, et al.
Published: (2025)

From Funding to Findings (FIND): An Open Database of NSF Awards and Research Outputs
by: Smith, Kazimier, et al.
Published: (2025)

Commitment Checklist: Auditing Author Commitments in Peer Review
by: Chen, Chung-Chi, et al.
Published: (2026)

Open Science, Open Innovation? The Role of Open Access in Patenting Activity
by: Maddi, Abdelghani, et al.
Published: (2025)

Handling Open Research Data within the Max Planck Society -- Looking Closer at the Year 2020
by: Boosen, Martin, et al.
Published: (2024)

Automated Peer Reviewing in Paper SEA: Standardization, Evaluation, and Analysis
by: Yu, Jianxiang, et al.
Published: (2024)

Compound Deception in Elite Peer Review: A Failure Mode Taxonomy of 100 Fabricated Citations at NeurIPS 2025
by: Ansari, Samar
Published: (2026)

WikiTexVC: MediaWiki's native LaTeX to MathML converter for Wikipedia
by: Stegmüller, Johannes, et al.
Published: (2024)