Probing the "Psyche'' of Large Reasoning Models: Understanding Through a Human Lens

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chen, Yuxiang, Wu, Zuohan, Wang, Ziwei, Yu, Xiangning, Li, Xujia, Yang, Linyi, Yang, Mengyue, Wang, Jun, Chen, Lei
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866909934660091904
author Chen, Yuxiang
Wu, Zuohan
Wang, Ziwei
Yu, Xiangning
Li, Xujia
Yang, Linyi
Yang, Mengyue
Wang, Jun
Chen, Lei
author_facet Chen, Yuxiang
Wu, Zuohan
Wang, Ziwei
Yu, Xiangning
Li, Xujia
Yang, Linyi
Yang, Mengyue
Wang, Jun
Chen, Lei
contents Large reasoning models (LRMs) have garnered significant attention from researchers owing to their exceptional capability in addressing complex tasks. Motivated by the observed human-like behaviors in their reasoning processes, this paper introduces a comprehensive taxonomy to characterize atomic reasoning steps and probe the ``psyche'' of LRM intelligence. Specifically, it comprises five groups and seventeen categories derived from human mental processes, thereby grounding the understanding of LRMs in an interdisciplinary perspective. The taxonomy is then applied for an in-depth understanding of current LRMs, resulting in a distinct labeled dataset that comprises 277,534 atomic reasoning steps. Using this resource, we analyze contemporary LRMs and distill several actionable takeaways for improving training and post-training of reasoning models. Notably, our analysis reveals that prevailing post-answer ``double-checks'' (self-monitoring evaluations) are largely superficial and rarely yield substantive revisions. Thus, incentivizing comprehensive multi-step reflection, rather than simple self-monitoring, may offer a more effective path forward. To complement the taxonomy, an automatic annotation framework, named CAPO, is proposed to leverage large language models (LLMs) for generating the taxonomy-based annotations. Experimental results demonstrate that CAPO achieves higher consistency with human experts compared to baselines, facilitating a scalable and comprehensive analysis of LRMs from a human cognitive perspective. Together, the taxonomy, CAPO, and the derived insights provide a principled, scalable path toward understanding and advancing LRM reasoning.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2512_00729
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Probing the "Psyche'' of Large Reasoning Models: Understanding Through a Human Lens
Chen, Yuxiang
Wu, Zuohan
Wang, Ziwei
Yu, Xiangning
Li, Xujia
Yang, Linyi
Yang, Mengyue
Wang, Jun
Chen, Lei
Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
Large reasoning models (LRMs) have garnered significant attention from researchers owing to their exceptional capability in addressing complex tasks. Motivated by the observed human-like behaviors in their reasoning processes, this paper introduces a comprehensive taxonomy to characterize atomic reasoning steps and probe the ``psyche'' of LRM intelligence. Specifically, it comprises five groups and seventeen categories derived from human mental processes, thereby grounding the understanding of LRMs in an interdisciplinary perspective. The taxonomy is then applied for an in-depth understanding of current LRMs, resulting in a distinct labeled dataset that comprises 277,534 atomic reasoning steps. Using this resource, we analyze contemporary LRMs and distill several actionable takeaways for improving training and post-training of reasoning models. Notably, our analysis reveals that prevailing post-answer ``double-checks'' (self-monitoring evaluations) are largely superficial and rarely yield substantive revisions. Thus, incentivizing comprehensive multi-step reflection, rather than simple self-monitoring, may offer a more effective path forward. To complement the taxonomy, an automatic annotation framework, named CAPO, is proposed to leverage large language models (LLMs) for generating the taxonomy-based annotations. Experimental results demonstrate that CAPO achieves higher consistency with human experts compared to baselines, facilitating a scalable and comprehensive analysis of LRMs from a human cognitive perspective. Together, the taxonomy, CAPO, and the derived insights provide a principled, scalable path toward understanding and advancing LRM reasoning.
title Probing the "Psyche'' of Large Reasoning Models: Understanding Through a Human Lens
topic Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.00729