Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kerber, Michael, Wang, Elena Xinyi
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.00821
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866917396161232896
author Kerber, Michael
Wang, Elena Xinyi
author_facet Kerber, Michael
Wang, Elena Xinyi
contents The Persistent Homology Transform (PHT) summarizes a shape in $\mathbb{R}^m$ by collecting persistence diagrams obtained from linear height filtrations in all directions on $\mathbb{S}^{m-1}$. It enjoys strong theoretical guarantees, including continuity, stability, and injectivity on broad classes of shapes. A natural way to compare two PHTs is to use the bottleneck distance between their diagrams as the direction varies. Prior work has either compared PHTs by sampling directions or, in 2D, computed the exact \textit{integral} of bottleneck distance over all angles via a kinetic data structure. We improve the integral objective to $\tilde O(n^5)$ in place of earlier $\tilde O(n^6)$ bound. For the \textit{max} objective, we give a $\tilde O(n^3)$ algorithm in $\mathbb{R}^2$ and a $\tilde O(n^5)$ algorithm in $\mathbb{R}^3$.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2512_00821
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Computing the Bottleneck Distance between Persistent Homology Transforms
Kerber, Michael
Wang, Elena Xinyi
Computational Geometry
The Persistent Homology Transform (PHT) summarizes a shape in $\mathbb{R}^m$ by collecting persistence diagrams obtained from linear height filtrations in all directions on $\mathbb{S}^{m-1}$. It enjoys strong theoretical guarantees, including continuity, stability, and injectivity on broad classes of shapes. A natural way to compare two PHTs is to use the bottleneck distance between their diagrams as the direction varies. Prior work has either compared PHTs by sampling directions or, in 2D, computed the exact \textit{integral} of bottleneck distance over all angles via a kinetic data structure. We improve the integral objective to $\tilde O(n^5)$ in place of earlier $\tilde O(n^6)$ bound. For the \textit{max} objective, we give a $\tilde O(n^3)$ algorithm in $\mathbb{R}^2$ and a $\tilde O(n^5)$ algorithm in $\mathbb{R}^3$.
title Computing the Bottleneck Distance between Persistent Homology Transforms
topic Computational Geometry
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.00821