David vs. Goliath: Can Small Models Win Big with Agentic AI in Hardware Design?

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Shankar, Shashwat, Pandey, Subhranshu, Mochahari, Innocent Dengkhw, Mali, Bhabesh, Chowdhury, Animesh Basak, Bhattacharjee, Sukanta, Karfa, Chandan
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2025
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866917125405278208
author Shankar, Shashwat
Pandey, Subhranshu
Mochahari, Innocent Dengkhw
Mali, Bhabesh
Chowdhury, Animesh Basak
Bhattacharjee, Sukanta
Karfa, Chandan
author_facet Shankar, Shashwat
Pandey, Subhranshu
Mochahari, Innocent Dengkhw
Mali, Bhabesh
Chowdhury, Animesh Basak
Bhattacharjee, Sukanta
Karfa, Chandan
contents Large Language Model(LLM) inference demands massive compute and energy, making domain-specific tasks expensive and unsustainable. As foundation models keep scaling, we ask: Is bigger always better for hardware design? Our work tests this by evaluating Small Language Models coupled with a curated agentic AI framework on NVIDIA's Comprehensive Verilog Design Problems(CVDP) benchmark. Results show that agentic workflows: through task decomposition, iterative feedback, and correction - not only unlock near-LLM performance at a fraction of the cost but also create learning opportunities for agents, paving the way for efficient, adaptive solutions in complex design tasks.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2512_05073
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle David vs. Goliath: Can Small Models Win Big with Agentic AI in Hardware Design?
Shankar, Shashwat
Pandey, Subhranshu
Mochahari, Innocent Dengkhw
Mali, Bhabesh
Chowdhury, Animesh Basak
Bhattacharjee, Sukanta
Karfa, Chandan
Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
Hardware Architecture
Software Engineering
Large Language Model(LLM) inference demands massive compute and energy, making domain-specific tasks expensive and unsustainable. As foundation models keep scaling, we ask: Is bigger always better for hardware design? Our work tests this by evaluating Small Language Models coupled with a curated agentic AI framework on NVIDIA's Comprehensive Verilog Design Problems(CVDP) benchmark. Results show that agentic workflows: through task decomposition, iterative feedback, and correction - not only unlock near-LLM performance at a fraction of the cost but also create learning opportunities for agents, paving the way for efficient, adaptive solutions in complex design tasks.
title David vs. Goliath: Can Small Models Win Big with Agentic AI in Hardware Design?
topic Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
Hardware Architecture
Software Engineering
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.05073