Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Aliakbarpour, Maryam, Braverman, Vladimir, Chia, Nai-Hui, Lin, Chia-Ying, Liu, Yuhan, Oufkir, Aadil, Shen, Yu-Ching
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2025
Soggetti:
Accesso online:https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.05451
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866914181910888448
author Aliakbarpour, Maryam
Braverman, Vladimir
Chia, Nai-Hui
Lin, Chia-Ying
Liu, Yuhan
Oufkir, Aadil
Shen, Yu-Ching
author_facet Aliakbarpour, Maryam
Braverman, Vladimir
Chia, Nai-Hui
Lin, Chia-Ying
Liu, Yuhan
Oufkir, Aadil
Shen, Yu-Ching
contents We study single-copy shadow tomography in the adversarial robust setting, where the goal is to learn the expectation values of $M$ observables $O_1, \ldots, O_M$ with $\varepsilon$ accuracy, but $γ$-fraction of the outcomes can be arbitrarily corrupted by an adversary. We show that all non-adaptive shadow tomography algorithms must incur an error of $\varepsilon=\tildeΩ(γ\min\{\sqrt{M}, \sqrt{d}\})$ for some choice of observables, even with unlimited copies. Unfortunately, the classical shadows algorithm by [HKP20] and naive algorithms that directly measure each observable suffer even more. We design an algorithm that achieves an error of $\varepsilon=\tilde{O}(γ\max_{i\in[M]}\|O_i\|_{HS})$, which nearly matches our worst-case error lower bound for $M\ge d$ and guarantees better accuracy when the observables have stronger structure. Remarkably, the algorithm only needs $n=\frac{1}{γ^2}\log(M/δ)$ copies to achieve that error with probability at least $1-δ$, matching the sample complexity of the classical shadows algorithm that achieves the same error without corrupted measurement outcomes. Our algorithm is conceptually simple and easy to implement. Classical simulation for fidelity estimation shows that our algorithm enjoys much stronger robustness than [HKP20] under adversarial noise. Finally, based on a reduction from full-state tomography to shadow tomography, we prove that for rank $r$ states, both the near-optimal asymptotic error of $\varepsilon=\tilde{O}(γ\sqrt{r})$ and copy complexity $\tilde{O}(dr^2/\varepsilon^2)=\tilde{O}(dr/γ^2)$ can be achieved for adversarially robust state tomography, closing the large gap in [ABCL25] where optimal error can only be achieved using pseudo-polynomial number of copies in $d$.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2512_05451
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Shadow Tomography Against Adversaries
Aliakbarpour, Maryam
Braverman, Vladimir
Chia, Nai-Hui
Lin, Chia-Ying
Liu, Yuhan
Oufkir, Aadil
Shen, Yu-Ching
Quantum Physics
Computational Complexity
We study single-copy shadow tomography in the adversarial robust setting, where the goal is to learn the expectation values of $M$ observables $O_1, \ldots, O_M$ with $\varepsilon$ accuracy, but $γ$-fraction of the outcomes can be arbitrarily corrupted by an adversary. We show that all non-adaptive shadow tomography algorithms must incur an error of $\varepsilon=\tildeΩ(γ\min\{\sqrt{M}, \sqrt{d}\})$ for some choice of observables, even with unlimited copies. Unfortunately, the classical shadows algorithm by [HKP20] and naive algorithms that directly measure each observable suffer even more. We design an algorithm that achieves an error of $\varepsilon=\tilde{O}(γ\max_{i\in[M]}\|O_i\|_{HS})$, which nearly matches our worst-case error lower bound for $M\ge d$ and guarantees better accuracy when the observables have stronger structure. Remarkably, the algorithm only needs $n=\frac{1}{γ^2}\log(M/δ)$ copies to achieve that error with probability at least $1-δ$, matching the sample complexity of the classical shadows algorithm that achieves the same error without corrupted measurement outcomes. Our algorithm is conceptually simple and easy to implement. Classical simulation for fidelity estimation shows that our algorithm enjoys much stronger robustness than [HKP20] under adversarial noise. Finally, based on a reduction from full-state tomography to shadow tomography, we prove that for rank $r$ states, both the near-optimal asymptotic error of $\varepsilon=\tilde{O}(γ\sqrt{r})$ and copy complexity $\tilde{O}(dr^2/\varepsilon^2)=\tilde{O}(dr/γ^2)$ can be achieved for adversarially robust state tomography, closing the large gap in [ABCL25] where optimal error can only be achieved using pseudo-polynomial number of copies in $d$.
title Shadow Tomography Against Adversaries
topic Quantum Physics
Computational Complexity
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.05451