On measuring grounding and generalizing grounding problems

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Quigley, Daniel, Maynard, Eric
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2025
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866912796602531840
author Quigley, Daniel
Maynard, Eric
author_facet Quigley, Daniel
Maynard, Eric
contents The symbol grounding problem asks how tokens like cat can be about cats, as opposed to mere shapes manipulated in a calculus. We recast grounding from a binary judgment into an audit across desiderata, each indexed by an evaluation tuple (context, meaning type, threat model, reference distribution): authenticity (mechanisms reside inside the agent and, for strong claims, were acquired through learning or evolution); preservation (atomic meanings remain intact); faithfulness, both correlational (realized meanings match intended ones) and etiological (internal mechanisms causally contribute to success); robustness (graceful degradation under declared perturbations); compositionality (the whole is built systematically from the parts). We apply this framework to four grounding modes (symbolic; referential; vectorial; relational) and three case studies: model-theoretic semantics achieves exact composition but lacks etiological warrant; large language models show correlational fit and local robustness for linguistic tasks, yet lack selection-for-success on world tasks without grounded interaction; human language meets the desiderata under strong authenticity through evolutionary and developmental acquisition. By operationalizing a philosophical inquiry about representation, we equip philosophers of science, computer scientists, linguists, and mathematicians with a common language and technical framework for systematic investigation of grounding and meaning.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2512_06205
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle On measuring grounding and generalizing grounding problems
Quigley, Daniel
Maynard, Eric
Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
Machine Learning
68T01 (Primary) 68T05, 68T30, 68T35, 68T50, 68Q55 (Secondary)
I.2.0; I.2.1; I.2.4; I.2.6; I.2.7; I.2.11
The symbol grounding problem asks how tokens like cat can be about cats, as opposed to mere shapes manipulated in a calculus. We recast grounding from a binary judgment into an audit across desiderata, each indexed by an evaluation tuple (context, meaning type, threat model, reference distribution): authenticity (mechanisms reside inside the agent and, for strong claims, were acquired through learning or evolution); preservation (atomic meanings remain intact); faithfulness, both correlational (realized meanings match intended ones) and etiological (internal mechanisms causally contribute to success); robustness (graceful degradation under declared perturbations); compositionality (the whole is built systematically from the parts). We apply this framework to four grounding modes (symbolic; referential; vectorial; relational) and three case studies: model-theoretic semantics achieves exact composition but lacks etiological warrant; large language models show correlational fit and local robustness for linguistic tasks, yet lack selection-for-success on world tasks without grounded interaction; human language meets the desiderata under strong authenticity through evolutionary and developmental acquisition. By operationalizing a philosophical inquiry about representation, we equip philosophers of science, computer scientists, linguists, and mathematicians with a common language and technical framework for systematic investigation of grounding and meaning.
title On measuring grounding and generalizing grounding problems
topic Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
Machine Learning
68T01 (Primary) 68T05, 68T30, 68T35, 68T50, 68Q55 (Secondary)
I.2.0; I.2.1; I.2.4; I.2.6; I.2.7; I.2.11
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.06205