Revised comment on the paper titled "The Origin of Quantum Mechanical Statistics: Insights from Research on Human Language
Fuente:
arXiv
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2025
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866915661861617664 |
|---|---|
| author | Sienicki, Mikołaj Sienicki, Krzysztof |
| author_facet | Sienicki, Mikołaj Sienicki, Krzysztof |
| contents | This short note comments on \citet{Aerts2024Origin}, which proposes that ranked word frequencies in texts should be read through the lens of Bose--Einstein (BE) statistics and even used to illuminate the origin of quantum statistics in physics. The core message here is modest: the paper offers an interesting analogy and an eye-catching fit, but several key steps mix physical claims with definitions and curve-fitting choices. We highlight three such points: (i) a normalization issue that is presented as "bosonic enhancement", (ii) an identification of rank with energy that makes the BE fit only weakly diagnostic of an underlying mechanism, and (iii) a baseline comparison that is too weak to support an ontological conclusion. We also briefly flag a few additional concerns (interpretation drift, parameter semantics, and reproducibility). |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2512_07881 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Revised comment on the paper titled "The Origin of Quantum Mechanical Statistics: Insights from Research on Human Language Sienicki, Mikołaj Sienicki, Krzysztof Neurons and Cognition History and Philosophy of Physics This short note comments on \citet{Aerts2024Origin}, which proposes that ranked word frequencies in texts should be read through the lens of Bose--Einstein (BE) statistics and even used to illuminate the origin of quantum statistics in physics. The core message here is modest: the paper offers an interesting analogy and an eye-catching fit, but several key steps mix physical claims with definitions and curve-fitting choices. We highlight three such points: (i) a normalization issue that is presented as "bosonic enhancement", (ii) an identification of rank with energy that makes the BE fit only weakly diagnostic of an underlying mechanism, and (iii) a baseline comparison that is too weak to support an ontological conclusion. We also briefly flag a few additional concerns (interpretation drift, parameter semantics, and reproducibility). |
| title | Revised comment on the paper titled "The Origin of Quantum Mechanical Statistics: Insights from Research on Human Language |
| topic | Neurons and Cognition History and Philosophy of Physics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.07881 |