Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gorbach, Tetiana, de Luna, Xavier, Karvanen, Juha, Waernbaum, Ingeborg
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.09130
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866915664744153088
author Gorbach, Tetiana
de Luna, Xavier
Karvanen, Juha
Waernbaum, Ingeborg
author_facet Gorbach, Tetiana
de Luna, Xavier
Karvanen, Juha
Waernbaum, Ingeborg
contents This article contributes to the discussion on the relationship between the Neyman-Rubin and the graphical frameworks for causal inference. We present specific examples of data-generating mechanisms - such as those involving undirected or deterministic relationships and cycles - where analyses using a directed acyclic graph are challenging, but where the tools from the Neyman-Rubin causal framework are readily applicable. We also provide examples of data-generating mechanisms with M-bias, trapdoor variables, and complex front-door structures, where the application of the Neyman-Rubin approach is complicated, but the graphical approach is directly usable. The examples offer insights into commonly used causal inference frameworks and aim to improve comprehension of the languages for causal reasoning among a broad audience.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2512_09130
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Complementary strengths of the Neyman-Rubin and graphical causal frameworks
Gorbach, Tetiana
de Luna, Xavier
Karvanen, Juha
Waernbaum, Ingeborg
Methodology
This article contributes to the discussion on the relationship between the Neyman-Rubin and the graphical frameworks for causal inference. We present specific examples of data-generating mechanisms - such as those involving undirected or deterministic relationships and cycles - where analyses using a directed acyclic graph are challenging, but where the tools from the Neyman-Rubin causal framework are readily applicable. We also provide examples of data-generating mechanisms with M-bias, trapdoor variables, and complex front-door structures, where the application of the Neyman-Rubin approach is complicated, but the graphical approach is directly usable. The examples offer insights into commonly used causal inference frameworks and aim to improve comprehension of the languages for causal reasoning among a broad audience.
title Complementary strengths of the Neyman-Rubin and graphical causal frameworks
topic Methodology
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.09130