Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Esfandiari, Yasaman, Rego, Jocelyn, Meyer, Austin, Gallagher, Jonathan, Levy, Mia
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.09199
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866912756296318976
author Esfandiari, Yasaman
Rego, Jocelyn
Meyer, Austin
Gallagher, Jonathan
Levy, Mia
author_facet Esfandiari, Yasaman
Rego, Jocelyn
Meyer, Austin
Gallagher, Jonathan
Levy, Mia
contents Large Language Models (LLMs) and transformer architectures have shown impressive reasoning and generation capabilities across diverse natural language tasks. However, their reliability and robustness in real-world engineering domains remain largely unexplored, limiting their practical utility in human-centric workflows. In this work, we investigate the applicability and consistency of LLMs for analog circuit design -- a task requiring domain-specific reasoning, adherence to physical constraints, and structured representations -- focusing on AI-assisted design where humans remain in the loop. We study how different data representations influence model behavior and compare smaller models (e.g., T5, GPT-2) with larger foundation models (e.g., Mistral-7B, GPT-oss-20B) under varying training conditions. Our results highlight key reliability challenges, including sensitivity to data format, instability in generated designs, and limited generalization to unseen circuit configurations. These findings provide early evidence on the limits and potential of LLMs as tools to enhance human capabilities in complex engineering tasks, offering insights into designing reliable, deployable foundation models for structured, real-world applications.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2512_09199
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle LLMs for Analog Circuit Design Continuum (ACDC)
Esfandiari, Yasaman
Rego, Jocelyn
Meyer, Austin
Gallagher, Jonathan
Levy, Mia
Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
Performance
Large Language Models (LLMs) and transformer architectures have shown impressive reasoning and generation capabilities across diverse natural language tasks. However, their reliability and robustness in real-world engineering domains remain largely unexplored, limiting their practical utility in human-centric workflows. In this work, we investigate the applicability and consistency of LLMs for analog circuit design -- a task requiring domain-specific reasoning, adherence to physical constraints, and structured representations -- focusing on AI-assisted design where humans remain in the loop. We study how different data representations influence model behavior and compare smaller models (e.g., T5, GPT-2) with larger foundation models (e.g., Mistral-7B, GPT-oss-20B) under varying training conditions. Our results highlight key reliability challenges, including sensitivity to data format, instability in generated designs, and limited generalization to unseen circuit configurations. These findings provide early evidence on the limits and potential of LLMs as tools to enhance human capabilities in complex engineering tasks, offering insights into designing reliable, deployable foundation models for structured, real-world applications.
title LLMs for Analog Circuit Design Continuum (ACDC)
topic Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
Performance
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.09199