Platforms as Crime Scene, Judge, and Jury: How Victim-Survivors of Non-Consensual Intimate Imagery Report Abuse Online

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Qiwei, Li, Kennon, Katelyn, Bedera, Nicole, Eaton, Asia A., Gilbert, Eric, Schoenebeck, Sarita
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2025
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866917147339390976
author Qiwei, Li
Kennon, Katelyn
Bedera, Nicole
Eaton, Asia A.
Gilbert, Eric
Schoenebeck, Sarita
author_facet Qiwei, Li
Kennon, Katelyn
Bedera, Nicole
Eaton, Asia A.
Gilbert, Eric
Schoenebeck, Sarita
contents Non-consensual intimate imagery (NCII), also known as image-based sexual abuse (IBSA), is mediated through online platforms. Victim-survivors must turn to platforms to collect evidence and request content removal. Platforms act as the crime scene, judge, and jury, determining whether perpetrators face consequences and if harmful material is removed. We present a study of NCII victim-survivors' online reporting experiences, drawing on trauma-informed interviews with 13 participants. We find that platform reporting processes are hostile, opaque, and ineffective, often forcing complex harms into narrow interfaces, responding inconsistently, and failing to result in meaningful action. Leveraging institutional betrayal theory, we show how platforms' structures and practices compound harm, and, in doing so, surface concrete intervention points for redesigning reporting systems and shaping policy to better support victim-survivors
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2512_13500
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Platforms as Crime Scene, Judge, and Jury: How Victim-Survivors of Non-Consensual Intimate Imagery Report Abuse Online
Qiwei, Li
Kennon, Katelyn
Bedera, Nicole
Eaton, Asia A.
Gilbert, Eric
Schoenebeck, Sarita
Human-Computer Interaction
Computers and Society
Non-consensual intimate imagery (NCII), also known as image-based sexual abuse (IBSA), is mediated through online platforms. Victim-survivors must turn to platforms to collect evidence and request content removal. Platforms act as the crime scene, judge, and jury, determining whether perpetrators face consequences and if harmful material is removed. We present a study of NCII victim-survivors' online reporting experiences, drawing on trauma-informed interviews with 13 participants. We find that platform reporting processes are hostile, opaque, and ineffective, often forcing complex harms into narrow interfaces, responding inconsistently, and failing to result in meaningful action. Leveraging institutional betrayal theory, we show how platforms' structures and practices compound harm, and, in doing so, surface concrete intervention points for redesigning reporting systems and shaping policy to better support victim-survivors
title Platforms as Crime Scene, Judge, and Jury: How Victim-Survivors of Non-Consensual Intimate Imagery Report Abuse Online
topic Human-Computer Interaction
Computers and Society
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.13500