Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Li, Kezhuo, Grzegorczyk, Marco
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.14512
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866908714810736640
author Li, Kezhuo
Grzegorczyk, Marco
author_facet Li, Kezhuo
Grzegorczyk, Marco
contents Gaussian Dynamic Bayesian Networks (GDBNs) are a widely used tool for learning network structures from continuous time-series data. To capture both time-lagged and contemporaneous dependencies, advanced GDBNs allow for dynamic inter-slice edges as well as static intra-slice edges. In the literature, two Bayesian modeling approaches have been developed for GDBNs. Both build on and extend the well-known Gaussian BGe score. We refer to them as the mean-adjusted BGe (mBGe) and the extended BGe (eBGe) models. In this paper, we contrast the two models and compare their performance empirically. The main finding of our study is that the two models induce different equivalence classes of network structures. In particular, the equivalence classes implied by the eBGe model are non-standard, and we propose a new variant of the DAG-to-CPDAG algorithm to identify them. To the best of our knowledge, these non-standard equivalence classes have not been previously reported.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2512_14512
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Two Bayesian Approaches to Dynamic Gaussian Bayesian Networks with Intra- and Inter-Slice Edges
Li, Kezhuo
Grzegorczyk, Marco
Computation
Gaussian Dynamic Bayesian Networks (GDBNs) are a widely used tool for learning network structures from continuous time-series data. To capture both time-lagged and contemporaneous dependencies, advanced GDBNs allow for dynamic inter-slice edges as well as static intra-slice edges. In the literature, two Bayesian modeling approaches have been developed for GDBNs. Both build on and extend the well-known Gaussian BGe score. We refer to them as the mean-adjusted BGe (mBGe) and the extended BGe (eBGe) models. In this paper, we contrast the two models and compare their performance empirically. The main finding of our study is that the two models induce different equivalence classes of network structures. In particular, the equivalence classes implied by the eBGe model are non-standard, and we propose a new variant of the DAG-to-CPDAG algorithm to identify them. To the best of our knowledge, these non-standard equivalence classes have not been previously reported.
title Two Bayesian Approaches to Dynamic Gaussian Bayesian Networks with Intra- and Inter-Slice Edges
topic Computation
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.14512