Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Martinez, Antoine, Karyu, Hiroki, Brecht, Amanda, Gilli, Gabriella, Lebonnois, Sebastien, Kuroda, Takeshi, Stolzenbach, Aurelien, Galindo, Francisco Gonzalez, Bougher, Stephen, Fujiwara, Hitoshi
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.16693
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866911326011392000
author Martinez, Antoine
Karyu, Hiroki
Brecht, Amanda
Gilli, Gabriella
Lebonnois, Sebastien
Kuroda, Takeshi
Stolzenbach, Aurelien
Galindo, Francisco Gonzalez
Bougher, Stephen
Fujiwara, Hitoshi
author_facet Martinez, Antoine
Karyu, Hiroki
Brecht, Amanda
Gilli, Gabriella
Lebonnois, Sebastien
Kuroda, Takeshi
Stolzenbach, Aurelien
Galindo, Francisco Gonzalez
Bougher, Stephen
Fujiwara, Hitoshi
contents In the context of future Venusian missions, it is crucial to improve our understanding of Venus upper atmosphere through 3D modeling, notably for spacecraft orbit computation. This study compares three General Circulation Models (GCMs) of the Venusian atmosphere up to the exosphere: the Venus Planetary Climate Model (Venus PCM), the Venus Thermospheric Global Model (VTGCM) and the Tohoku University GCM (TUGCM), focusing on their nominal simulations (e.g. composition, thermal structure and heating/cooling rates). Similarities and discrepancies among them are discussed in this paper, together with data-models comparison. The nominal simulations analyzed in this study fail to accurately reproduce the daytime observations of Pioneer Venus, notably overestimating the exospheric temperature. This is linked to an underestimation of the atomic oxygen (O) abundance in the three GCMs, and suggests the need of additional O production in the thermosphere. The selection of solar spectrum is also the main reason for the discrepancies between the models in terms of temperature dependence on solar activity. A list of recommendations is proposed aiming at improving the modeling of Venus' upper atmosphere, among them: 1. Standardize the EUV-UV solar spectrum input. 2. Update the near-infrared heating scheme with Venus Express-Era data. 3. Reassess Radiative cooling schemes. 4. Investigate the underestimated atomic Oxygen abundance.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2512_16693
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Comparison of General Circulation Models of the Venus upper atmosphere
Martinez, Antoine
Karyu, Hiroki
Brecht, Amanda
Gilli, Gabriella
Lebonnois, Sebastien
Kuroda, Takeshi
Stolzenbach, Aurelien
Galindo, Francisco Gonzalez
Bougher, Stephen
Fujiwara, Hitoshi
Earth and Planetary Astrophysics
In the context of future Venusian missions, it is crucial to improve our understanding of Venus upper atmosphere through 3D modeling, notably for spacecraft orbit computation. This study compares three General Circulation Models (GCMs) of the Venusian atmosphere up to the exosphere: the Venus Planetary Climate Model (Venus PCM), the Venus Thermospheric Global Model (VTGCM) and the Tohoku University GCM (TUGCM), focusing on their nominal simulations (e.g. composition, thermal structure and heating/cooling rates). Similarities and discrepancies among them are discussed in this paper, together with data-models comparison. The nominal simulations analyzed in this study fail to accurately reproduce the daytime observations of Pioneer Venus, notably overestimating the exospheric temperature. This is linked to an underestimation of the atomic oxygen (O) abundance in the three GCMs, and suggests the need of additional O production in the thermosphere. The selection of solar spectrum is also the main reason for the discrepancies between the models in terms of temperature dependence on solar activity. A list of recommendations is proposed aiming at improving the modeling of Venus' upper atmosphere, among them: 1. Standardize the EUV-UV solar spectrum input. 2. Update the near-infrared heating scheme with Venus Express-Era data. 3. Reassess Radiative cooling schemes. 4. Investigate the underestimated atomic Oxygen abundance.
title Comparison of General Circulation Models of the Venus upper atmosphere
topic Earth and Planetary Astrophysics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.16693