Vision-Language-Action Models for Autonomous Driving: Past, Present, and Future
Fuente:
arXiv
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2025
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866909980815261696 |
|---|---|
| author | Hu, Tianshuai Liu, Xiaolu Wang, Song Zhu, Yiyao Liang, Ao Kong, Lingdong Zhao, Guoyang Gong, Zeying Cen, Jun Huang, Zhiyu Hao, Xiaoshuai Li, Linfeng Song, Hang Li, Xiangtai Ma, Jun Shen, Shaojie Zhu, Jianke Tao, Dacheng Liu, Ziwei Liang, Junwei |
| author_facet | Hu, Tianshuai Liu, Xiaolu Wang, Song Zhu, Yiyao Liang, Ao Kong, Lingdong Zhao, Guoyang Gong, Zeying Cen, Jun Huang, Zhiyu Hao, Xiaoshuai Li, Linfeng Song, Hang Li, Xiangtai Ma, Jun Shen, Shaojie Zhu, Jianke Tao, Dacheng Liu, Ziwei Liang, Junwei |
| contents | Autonomous driving has long relied on modular "Perception-Decision-Action" pipelines, where hand-crafted interfaces and rule-based components often break down in complex or long-tailed scenarios. Their cascaded design further propagates perception errors, degrading downstream planning and control. Vision-Action (VA) models address some limitations by learning direct mappings from visual inputs to actions, but they remain opaque, sensitive to distribution shifts, and lack structured reasoning or instruction-following capabilities. Recent progress in Large Language Models (LLMs) and multimodal learning has motivated the emergence of Vision-Language-Action (VLA) frameworks, which integrate perception with language-grounded decision making. By unifying visual understanding, linguistic reasoning, and actionable outputs, VLAs offer a pathway toward more interpretable, generalizable, and human-aligned driving policies. This work provides a structured characterization of the emerging VLA landscape for autonomous driving. We trace the evolution from early VA approaches to modern VLA frameworks and organize existing methods into two principal paradigms: End-to-End VLA, which integrates perception, reasoning, and planning within a single model, and Dual-System VLA, which separates slow deliberation (via VLMs) from fast, safety-critical execution (via planners). Within these paradigms, we further distinguish subclasses such as textual vs. numerical action generators and explicit vs. implicit guidance mechanisms. We also summarize representative datasets and benchmarks for evaluating VLA-based driving systems and highlight key challenges and open directions, including robustness, interpretability, and instruction fidelity. Overall, this work aims to establish a coherent foundation for advancing human-compatible autonomous driving systems. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2512_16760 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Vision-Language-Action Models for Autonomous Driving: Past, Present, and Future Hu, Tianshuai Liu, Xiaolu Wang, Song Zhu, Yiyao Liang, Ao Kong, Lingdong Zhao, Guoyang Gong, Zeying Cen, Jun Huang, Zhiyu Hao, Xiaoshuai Li, Linfeng Song, Hang Li, Xiangtai Ma, Jun Shen, Shaojie Zhu, Jianke Tao, Dacheng Liu, Ziwei Liang, Junwei Robotics Autonomous driving has long relied on modular "Perception-Decision-Action" pipelines, where hand-crafted interfaces and rule-based components often break down in complex or long-tailed scenarios. Their cascaded design further propagates perception errors, degrading downstream planning and control. Vision-Action (VA) models address some limitations by learning direct mappings from visual inputs to actions, but they remain opaque, sensitive to distribution shifts, and lack structured reasoning or instruction-following capabilities. Recent progress in Large Language Models (LLMs) and multimodal learning has motivated the emergence of Vision-Language-Action (VLA) frameworks, which integrate perception with language-grounded decision making. By unifying visual understanding, linguistic reasoning, and actionable outputs, VLAs offer a pathway toward more interpretable, generalizable, and human-aligned driving policies. This work provides a structured characterization of the emerging VLA landscape for autonomous driving. We trace the evolution from early VA approaches to modern VLA frameworks and organize existing methods into two principal paradigms: End-to-End VLA, which integrates perception, reasoning, and planning within a single model, and Dual-System VLA, which separates slow deliberation (via VLMs) from fast, safety-critical execution (via planners). Within these paradigms, we further distinguish subclasses such as textual vs. numerical action generators and explicit vs. implicit guidance mechanisms. We also summarize representative datasets and benchmarks for evaluating VLA-based driving systems and highlight key challenges and open directions, including robustness, interpretability, and instruction fidelity. Overall, this work aims to establish a coherent foundation for advancing human-compatible autonomous driving systems. |
| title | Vision-Language-Action Models for Autonomous Driving: Past, Present, and Future |
| topic | Robotics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.16760 |