Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.16768 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866917495042998272 |
|---|---|
| author | Lim, Soon Hoe |
| author_facet | Lim, Soon Hoe |
| contents | Flow matching (FM) constructs continuous-time ODE samplers by prescribing probability paths between a base distribution and a target distribution. In this note, we study FM through the lens of finite-sample plug-in estimation. In addition to replacing population expectations by sample averages, one may replace the target distribution itself by a finite-sample surrogate, ranging from the empirical measure to a smoothed estimator. This viewpoint yields a natural hierarchy of empirical FM models. For affine conditional flows, we derive the exact empirical minimizer and identify a smoothed plug-in regime in which the terminal law is exactly a kernel-mixture estimator. This plug-in perspective clarifies several coupled finite-sample biases of empirical FM. First, replacing the target law by a finite-sample surrogate changes the statistical target. Second, the empirical minimizer is generally not a gradient field, even when each conditional flow is. Third, a fixed empirical marginal path does not determine a unique particle dynamics: one may add extra vector fields whose probability flux has zero divergence without changing the marginal path. For Gaussian affine conditional paths, we give explicit families of such flux-null corrections. Finally, the source distribution provides a primary mechanism controlling upper tails of kinetic energy. In particular, Gaussian bases yield exponential upper-tail bounds for instantaneous and integrated kinetic energies, whereas polynomially tailed bases yield corresponding polynomial upper-tail bounds. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2512_16768 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | On The Hidden Biases of Flow Matching Samplers Lim, Soon Hoe Machine Learning Probability Flow matching (FM) constructs continuous-time ODE samplers by prescribing probability paths between a base distribution and a target distribution. In this note, we study FM through the lens of finite-sample plug-in estimation. In addition to replacing population expectations by sample averages, one may replace the target distribution itself by a finite-sample surrogate, ranging from the empirical measure to a smoothed estimator. This viewpoint yields a natural hierarchy of empirical FM models. For affine conditional flows, we derive the exact empirical minimizer and identify a smoothed plug-in regime in which the terminal law is exactly a kernel-mixture estimator. This plug-in perspective clarifies several coupled finite-sample biases of empirical FM. First, replacing the target law by a finite-sample surrogate changes the statistical target. Second, the empirical minimizer is generally not a gradient field, even when each conditional flow is. Third, a fixed empirical marginal path does not determine a unique particle dynamics: one may add extra vector fields whose probability flux has zero divergence without changing the marginal path. For Gaussian affine conditional paths, we give explicit families of such flux-null corrections. Finally, the source distribution provides a primary mechanism controlling upper tails of kinetic energy. In particular, Gaussian bases yield exponential upper-tail bounds for instantaneous and integrated kinetic energies, whereas polynomially tailed bases yield corresponding polynomial upper-tail bounds. |
| title | On The Hidden Biases of Flow Matching Samplers |
| topic | Machine Learning Probability |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.16768 |