Am I Confused or Is This Confusing?: Deep Ensembles for ENSO Uncertainty Quantification
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866911533537165312 |
|---|---|
| author | McAfee, Devin M. Barnes, Elizabeth A. |
| author_facet | McAfee, Devin M. Barnes, Elizabeth A. |
| contents | Faithful uncertainty quantification (UQ) is paramount in high stakes climate prediction. Deep ensembles, or ensembles of probabilistic neural networks, are state of the art for UQ in machine learning (ML) and are growing increasingly popular for weather and climate prediction. However, detailed analyses of the mechanisms, strengths, and limitations of ensembles in these complex problem settings are lacking. We take a step towards filling this gap by deploying deep ensembles for predictability analysis of the El-Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) in the Community Earth System Model 2 Large Ensemble (CESM2-LE). Principally, we show that epistemic uncertainty, modeled by ensemble disagreement, robustly signals predictive error growth associated with shifts in the distributions of monthly sea-surface temperature (SST), ocean heat content (OHC), and zonal surface wind stress ($τ_x$) anomalies under a climate change scenario. Conversely, we find that aleatoric uncertainty, which remains a popular measure of model confidence, becomes less reliable and behaves counterintuitively under climate-change-induced distributional shift. We highlight that, because ensemble performance improvement relative to the expected single model scales with epistemic uncertainty, ensemble improvement increases with distributional shift from climate change. This work demonstrates the utility of deep ensembles for modeling aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty in ML climate prediction, as well as the growing importance of robustly quantifying these two forms of uncertainty under anthropogenic warming. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2512_17153 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Am I Confused or Is This Confusing?: Deep Ensembles for ENSO Uncertainty Quantification McAfee, Devin M. Barnes, Elizabeth A. Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics Faithful uncertainty quantification (UQ) is paramount in high stakes climate prediction. Deep ensembles, or ensembles of probabilistic neural networks, are state of the art for UQ in machine learning (ML) and are growing increasingly popular for weather and climate prediction. However, detailed analyses of the mechanisms, strengths, and limitations of ensembles in these complex problem settings are lacking. We take a step towards filling this gap by deploying deep ensembles for predictability analysis of the El-Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) in the Community Earth System Model 2 Large Ensemble (CESM2-LE). Principally, we show that epistemic uncertainty, modeled by ensemble disagreement, robustly signals predictive error growth associated with shifts in the distributions of monthly sea-surface temperature (SST), ocean heat content (OHC), and zonal surface wind stress ($τ_x$) anomalies under a climate change scenario. Conversely, we find that aleatoric uncertainty, which remains a popular measure of model confidence, becomes less reliable and behaves counterintuitively under climate-change-induced distributional shift. We highlight that, because ensemble performance improvement relative to the expected single model scales with epistemic uncertainty, ensemble improvement increases with distributional shift from climate change. This work demonstrates the utility of deep ensembles for modeling aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty in ML climate prediction, as well as the growing importance of robustly quantifying these two forms of uncertainty under anthropogenic warming. |
| title | Am I Confused or Is This Confusing?: Deep Ensembles for ENSO Uncertainty Quantification |
| topic | Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.17153 |