From Priors to Predictions: Explaining and Visualizing Human Reasoning in a Graph Neural Network Framework
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866917156875141120 |
|---|---|
| author | Do, Quan Ahn, Caroline Bakst, Leah Pascale, Michael McGuire, Joseph T. Stern, Chantal E. Hasselmo, Michael E. |
| author_facet | Do, Quan Ahn, Caroline Bakst, Leah Pascale, Michael McGuire, Joseph T. Stern, Chantal E. Hasselmo, Michael E. |
| contents | Humans excel at solving novel reasoning problems from minimal exposure, guided by inductive biases, assumptions about which entities and relationships matter. Yet the computational form of these biases and their neural implementation remain poorly understood. We introduce a framework that combines Graph Theory and Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to formalize inductive biases as explicit, manipulable priors over structure and abstraction. Using a human behavioral dataset adapted from the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus (ARC), we show that differences in graph-based priors can explain individual differences in human solutions. Our method includes an optimization pipeline that searches over graph configurations, varying edge connectivity and node abstraction, and a visualization approach that identifies the computational graph, the subset of nodes and edges most critical to a model's prediction. Systematic ablation reveals how generalization depends on specific prior structures and internal processing, exposing why human like errors emerge from incorrect or incomplete priors. This work provides a principled, interpretable framework for modeling the representational assumptions and computational dynamics underlying generalization, offering new insights into human reasoning and a foundation for more human aligned AI systems. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2512_17255 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | From Priors to Predictions: Explaining and Visualizing Human Reasoning in a Graph Neural Network Framework Do, Quan Ahn, Caroline Bakst, Leah Pascale, Michael McGuire, Joseph T. Stern, Chantal E. Hasselmo, Michael E. Neurons and Cognition Artificial Intelligence Humans excel at solving novel reasoning problems from minimal exposure, guided by inductive biases, assumptions about which entities and relationships matter. Yet the computational form of these biases and their neural implementation remain poorly understood. We introduce a framework that combines Graph Theory and Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to formalize inductive biases as explicit, manipulable priors over structure and abstraction. Using a human behavioral dataset adapted from the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus (ARC), we show that differences in graph-based priors can explain individual differences in human solutions. Our method includes an optimization pipeline that searches over graph configurations, varying edge connectivity and node abstraction, and a visualization approach that identifies the computational graph, the subset of nodes and edges most critical to a model's prediction. Systematic ablation reveals how generalization depends on specific prior structures and internal processing, exposing why human like errors emerge from incorrect or incomplete priors. This work provides a principled, interpretable framework for modeling the representational assumptions and computational dynamics underlying generalization, offering new insights into human reasoning and a foundation for more human aligned AI systems. |
| title | From Priors to Predictions: Explaining and Visualizing Human Reasoning in a Graph Neural Network Framework |
| topic | Neurons and Cognition Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.17255 |