_version_ 1866918256223191040
author Reinke, Annika
Christodoulou, Evangelia
Sadananda, Sthuthi
Kavur, A. Emre
Faryna, Khrystyna
Schouten, Daan
Landman, Bennett A.
Sudre, Carole
Colliot, Olivier
Heller, Nick
Loizillon, Sophie
Maška, Martin
Solal, Maëlys
Yazdan-Panah, Arya
Bozgo, Vilma
Sümer, Ömer
de Jong, Siem
Fischer, Sophie
Kozubek, Michal
Rädsch, Tim
Hammoud, Nadim
Molnár-Gábor, Fruzsina
Hicks, Steven
Riegler, Michael A.
Saha, Anindo
Thambawita, Vajira
Halvorsen, Pal
Jiménez-Sánchez, Amelia
Yang, Qingyang
Cheplygina, Veronika
Bottazzi, Sabrina
Seitel, Alexander
Bakas, Spyridon
Karargyris, Alexandros
Venkadesh, Kiran Vaidhya
van Ginneken, Bram
Maier-Hein, Lena
author_facet Reinke, Annika
Christodoulou, Evangelia
Sadananda, Sthuthi
Kavur, A. Emre
Faryna, Khrystyna
Schouten, Daan
Landman, Bennett A.
Sudre, Carole
Colliot, Olivier
Heller, Nick
Loizillon, Sophie
Maška, Martin
Solal, Maëlys
Yazdan-Panah, Arya
Bozgo, Vilma
Sümer, Ömer
de Jong, Siem
Fischer, Sophie
Kozubek, Michal
Rädsch, Tim
Hammoud, Nadim
Molnár-Gábor, Fruzsina
Hicks, Steven
Riegler, Michael A.
Saha, Anindo
Thambawita, Vajira
Halvorsen, Pal
Jiménez-Sánchez, Amelia
Yang, Qingyang
Cheplygina, Veronika
Bottazzi, Sabrina
Seitel, Alexander
Bakas, Spyridon
Karargyris, Alexandros
Venkadesh, Kiran Vaidhya
van Ginneken, Bram
Maier-Hein, Lena
contents Benchmarking competitions are central to the development of artificial intelligence (AI) in medical imaging, defining performance standards and shaping methodological progress. However, it remains unclear whether these benchmarks provide data that are sufficiently representative, accessible, and reusable to support clinically meaningful AI. In this work, we assess fairness along two complementary dimensions: (1) whether challenge datasets are representative of real-world clinical diversity, and (2) whether they are accessible and legally reusable in line with the FAIR principles. To address this question, we conducted a large-scale systematic study of 241 biomedical image analysis challenges comprising 458 tasks across 19 imaging modalities. Our findings show substantial biases in dataset composition, including geographic location, modality-, and problem type-related biases, indicating that current benchmarks do not adequately reflect real-world clinical diversity. Despite their widespread influence, challenge datasets were frequently constrained by restrictive or ambiguous access conditions, inconsistent or non-compliant licensing practices, and incomplete documentation, limiting reproducibility and long-term reuse. Together, these shortcomings expose foundational fairness limitations in our benchmarking ecosystem and highlight a disconnect between leaderboard success and clinical relevance.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2512_17581
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Medical Imaging AI Competitions Lack Fairness
Reinke, Annika
Christodoulou, Evangelia
Sadananda, Sthuthi
Kavur, A. Emre
Faryna, Khrystyna
Schouten, Daan
Landman, Bennett A.
Sudre, Carole
Colliot, Olivier
Heller, Nick
Loizillon, Sophie
Maška, Martin
Solal, Maëlys
Yazdan-Panah, Arya
Bozgo, Vilma
Sümer, Ömer
de Jong, Siem
Fischer, Sophie
Kozubek, Michal
Rädsch, Tim
Hammoud, Nadim
Molnár-Gábor, Fruzsina
Hicks, Steven
Riegler, Michael A.
Saha, Anindo
Thambawita, Vajira
Halvorsen, Pal
Jiménez-Sánchez, Amelia
Yang, Qingyang
Cheplygina, Veronika
Bottazzi, Sabrina
Seitel, Alexander
Bakas, Spyridon
Karargyris, Alexandros
Venkadesh, Kiran Vaidhya
van Ginneken, Bram
Maier-Hein, Lena
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Benchmarking competitions are central to the development of artificial intelligence (AI) in medical imaging, defining performance standards and shaping methodological progress. However, it remains unclear whether these benchmarks provide data that are sufficiently representative, accessible, and reusable to support clinically meaningful AI. In this work, we assess fairness along two complementary dimensions: (1) whether challenge datasets are representative of real-world clinical diversity, and (2) whether they are accessible and legally reusable in line with the FAIR principles. To address this question, we conducted a large-scale systematic study of 241 biomedical image analysis challenges comprising 458 tasks across 19 imaging modalities. Our findings show substantial biases in dataset composition, including geographic location, modality-, and problem type-related biases, indicating that current benchmarks do not adequately reflect real-world clinical diversity. Despite their widespread influence, challenge datasets were frequently constrained by restrictive or ambiguous access conditions, inconsistent or non-compliant licensing practices, and incomplete documentation, limiting reproducibility and long-term reuse. Together, these shortcomings expose foundational fairness limitations in our benchmarking ecosystem and highlight a disconnect between leaderboard success and clinical relevance.
title Medical Imaging AI Competitions Lack Fairness
topic Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.17581