Effect measures for comparing paired event times

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Munko, Merle, Mack, Simon, Ditzhaus, Marc, Fröhling, Stefan, Dobler, Dennis, Edelmann, Dominic
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866908727292985344
author Munko, Merle
Mack, Simon
Ditzhaus, Marc
Fröhling, Stefan
Dobler, Dennis
Edelmann, Dominic
author_facet Munko, Merle
Mack, Simon
Ditzhaus, Marc
Fröhling, Stefan
Dobler, Dennis
Edelmann, Dominic
contents The progression-free survival ratio (PFSr) is a widely used measure in personalized oncology trials. It evaluates the effectiveness of treatment by comparing two consecutive event times - one under standard therapy and one under an experimental treatment. However, most proposed tests based on the PFSr cannot control the nominal type I error rate, even under mild assumptions such as random right-censoring. Consequently the results of these tests are often unreliable. As a remedy, we propose to estimate the relevant probabilities related to the PFSr by adapting recently developed methodology for the relative treatment effect between paired event times. As an additional alternative, we develop inference procedures based on differences and ratios of restricted mean survival times. An extensive simulation study confirms that the proposed novel methodology provides reliable inference, whereas previously proposed techniques break down in many realistic settings. The utility of our methods is further illustrated through an analysis of real data from a molecularly aided tumor trial.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2512_18860
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Effect measures for comparing paired event times
Munko, Merle
Mack, Simon
Ditzhaus, Marc
Fröhling, Stefan
Dobler, Dennis
Edelmann, Dominic
Methodology
The progression-free survival ratio (PFSr) is a widely used measure in personalized oncology trials. It evaluates the effectiveness of treatment by comparing two consecutive event times - one under standard therapy and one under an experimental treatment. However, most proposed tests based on the PFSr cannot control the nominal type I error rate, even under mild assumptions such as random right-censoring. Consequently the results of these tests are often unreliable. As a remedy, we propose to estimate the relevant probabilities related to the PFSr by adapting recently developed methodology for the relative treatment effect between paired event times. As an additional alternative, we develop inference procedures based on differences and ratios of restricted mean survival times. An extensive simulation study confirms that the proposed novel methodology provides reliable inference, whereas previously proposed techniques break down in many realistic settings. The utility of our methods is further illustrated through an analysis of real data from a molecularly aided tumor trial.
title Effect measures for comparing paired event times
topic Methodology
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.18860